KING JAMES BIBLE IS A BOOK THAT PEOPLE FIND EASIER TO READ BETWEEN THE LINES FOR SOME REASON. Maybe This Is Because People Like Reading Between The Lines Rather Than What Is Actually Been Stated. But then the reason could be the King James Bible is written in archaic English.
The main idea in the first is that God spoke to us in these last day by his son, but it includes many other details. The second rhetorically says that God never called any angel his son. How does this proposition connect to the thought of the whole preceding sentence?
Harry Richesanswer requested by Guido Arbia You seem to see something that is not in the Script. Maybe you are reading between the lines.
God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; (Hebrews 1:1–2 KJV)
Here is the same two verses in another translation that is, in as much, an updated KJV:
God, having in the past spoken to the fathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, has at the end of these days spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, through whom also he made the worlds. (Hebrews 1:1–2 WEB)
There is nothing to do with angels in these two verses. What we are effectively being told is that even though God chose to speak through various means in days gone by, today He speaks through the death and resurrection of His Son, Lord Jesus Christ. The Son of God is not someone who came into existence at the biological birth of the baby that came from womb of the virgin Mary, rather this is the Logos of Life, through whom God made the Universe, who entered the body of virgin’s child. The Truth Is Easy To Grasp When One Understands The Foundations Of Life