Bill Bonner is very upset that the Australians have voted "Yes" To Anal Sex as being normal, and Lesbians having the right to claim that they are equal to a heterosexual couple and ought to be recognized as capable of rearing children, even though they cannot produce children. He writes :
Same sex marriage
I am deeply opposed to Same
sex marriage. It is totally against God’s order of things Romans 1:17-25. To
have the favour of God we must love what God loves and hate what God hates. We
must not entertain our own ideas of what morality should be. God hates
homosexuality and lesbianism and any kind of sexual perversion. God hates
perversion of any kind. Both the Old and New Testaments support this view. If
you don’t want to believe the Bible that is your choice, but just because you
don’t believe it doesn't make it less true -and there is a price to be paid for
that lack of belief (Genesis 19:1-23, 24 [Sodom and Gomorrah], Luke 16:19-31
etc.) It is this very resistance to the Gospel’s message that permits humans to
entertain these perverted lifestyles in the first place. If people believed in
God they would fear and honour Him and not desire to pervert His will from that
which was intended. The intentions of God are very plain and cannot be confused
with any Same Sex agendas. “Male and female He created them and that they
should cleave together” (Genesis 1:27, 2:21-25).
Insemination can only occur if
a male inseminates a female whether through sexual intercourse, or nowadays,
through Invetro Fertilization programs. In either case it is necessary for male
sperm and a female ovary in order for a child to be conceived. Future contact
and relationship with the natural birth parents cannot be prohibited and to do
so is the violation of a basic human right. However, any such future contact
will cause initial emotional distress to both child, birth parents and also
surrogate parents, so any claim that Same Sex Marriage unions make, that a
child is raised emotionally harm free, are negated. Unqualified emotional damage may be done, for
it is yet to be ascertained with sufficient statistics the effect of these
planned sociological changes. Insufficient studies have been conducted on this
untried sociological experiment and the purveyors of this intention should have
demonstrated far more care responsibility and thought than they have on a
matter of such importance to the very fabric of society and its future.
Rights
Same Sex Marriage Equality is
an affront to the memory of our parents, grandparents and ancestors and their
values, It is an affront to their human rights even though they are no longer
with us and could we look them square in the eye and feel comfortable about
ourselves? We should hold dear what they held dear. This is honour.
The Same Sex Marriage Equality
demand is a distorted view of human rights. It demands a right that now
supersedes any other rights. It is the new kid on the block and has its
permanence by permission of the unsuspecting and largely apathetic, ignorant
tolerant. Furthermore, it ignores the rights of yet unborn generations and
their inability to speak.
Additionally our way of life
was established well and truly before any idea of these alternative lifestyles.
It is fundamentally unethical to take thousands of years of long held
established and world wide, traditional -not views -but values – and
supplant them with an untried sociological experiment on the whim of a
bunch of selfish, capricious and perverted minority beings and without
thought for repercussions of such actions, not just for the immediate
future, but the long term effects of a twisted society who have moved far away
from God’s values. They are selfish not because of their lifestyle only,
but because they are not content with leaving the way they live in the privacy
of their own home, but must flaunt it in the face of everyone and force them
into acceptance of it on a national level.
We the majority should not be forced to feel wrong because of them.
I am a mere vulnerable human
being. I have a right to live with my fellow human beings in peace and
tranquility and without the thought that their actions are going to bring
down the judgment of God upon society and thereby truncate my life also, or at
the very least cause me to see and experience the traumatic spectacle of
the wrath of God and - we will bring down the judgment of God upon us. I
despair of my own humanity. All human so called rights will be challenged by
no less than God if we go down this path. People are being forced into
acceptance and the consequences of that acceptance and, in the main, they
remain largely ignorant of those consequences and prefer to remain so, to
preserve the name and perception of tolerance.
The same sex marriage equality
minority insist that it is their basic human right to live in this manner.
Whilst they insist on their rights, they and those that support them, fail to
realise that the traditionalists also have rights -and these rights ,which
they have had for centuries, are now being threatened. These rights are:
•
freedom of
thought,
•
freedom of
speech,
•
freedom of
worship,
•
parental rights,
•
freedom of
education and
•
freedom of
conscience in respect of business and professional conduct.•
Instead of freedom, in fact
the reverse is threatened, by violation of anti-discrimination laws
specifically targeting those with a conscience toward God.
Progressive?
Just because other nations
have accepted this philosophy doesn’t mean that Australia has to in the name
of, or to be seen as progressive. Conformity has huge dangers.
Those who are trying to
orchestrate these changes, are they prepared to accept the unforeseen
consequences that will arise from such a massive shift in sociological
thinking?
What if these flawed
individuals proposing and initiating this new sociological experiment are mere
pawns in a much bigger game?
This is Desecration! Do You
want to be part of this?
I am deeply disturbed about
this. I don’t want to live in or, be a part of a society that condones homosexual
and lesbian conduct. I can’t force my values on society. God does not even do
that although, at some point, every human being that has ever lived on the face
of the earth will be forced to yield to Him - and I would not like to be in the
shoes of those who have rebelled against Him and thumbed their noses at His
values.
•
it is a
desecration of our most sacred values
•
it desecrates our
history
•
it desecrates the
memory of what our parents stood for
•
it murders the
idea of a properly constituted society for future generations
•
it is the
perverted ideas of a minority against a majority
•
it is bullying
•
it is capricious
•
it is hideously
flawed
•
it is shameless•
Those who want to live in this
shameless way, let them. But don’t call it marriage. They should
not be afforded the rights that legitimately married people have. Don’t equate
their lifestyle with that of people who have legitimately married before God,
or acknowledged their gender, even if before a civil celebrant.
The Same Sex Marriage Equality
platform is using scandalous means to promote their wickedness by using
unqualified, yet loud and influential voices to back their argument. Eg. entertainers and politicians
Many people are ill informed
about this subject and its deeper repercussions, implications and
ramifications. It attacks:
•
free speech and the right to worship
•
parental rights
•
education and human rights
•
the psychological makeup of children
•
it affords rights to those who should not have
such rights e.g. pedophiles- refer to Safe Schools Program
Child Rearing
The philosophy of Same Sex
Marriage rearing is flawed at it very genus i.e. an impressionable child starts
out with a distorted view of the sociology of, not just human interaction, but
all biological action and function.
Same Sex Marriage Equality
murders the idea of a properly constituted society for future generations.
This, in itself cannot in any way be construed as not harmful. Murder, is
unacceptable in any society. People usually accept murder to be the taking of
another’s life without authority and the very idea of it is abhorrent to most
people. So why is it not abhorrent that a minority of humans want to murder,
not a person, but an idea, a psychological framework set up in the very DNA of
the human being by nature itself, or if you like by God, and thereby murder not
one or two people (bad enough in itself), but generations, if not their
personal longevity, certainly their public and private perceptions of
themselves, which in terms of numbers may be worse than literal murder? This
may sound a little melodramatic, however, this is only a layman’s limited
perception of the awesomeness of the yet unconsidered consequences of the
intended changes to our sociology by the selfish few.
Some, already brought up by
same sex gender parents, are being used to falsely demonstrate the benefits of
their same sex gender nurturing. We do not have sufficient psychological or
psychiatric data to demonstrate the truth of these early claims. Some of these
individuals may be deeply psychologically flawed and yet not be aware of
it.
Heterosexual Marriage and
Child Nurture
It is a sad indictment on
Heterosexual unions that children have not always benefited as well as they
might have done had the attitudes and efforts of the parents been more
positive. This is testimony as to why
heterosexual marriage is so important and why the same sex marriage equality
camp have so much ammunition against traditional marriages. However, it should
be understood that marriage is God’s idea and with His teachings
firmly as our guide and a personal relationship with Him paramount in our
lives, marriage has so much more meaning and becomes a life time focus of our
efforts and not just a Hollywood ceremony lasting six weeks, or six years, but
a lifetime commitment of both partners to child rearing and positive influences
to community objectives of safe, God honouring goals.
The Young Generation
A real shepherd could not
stand by and watch the sheep in his care herded toward a pack of wolves without
trying to do something to prevent their destruction. The young are in the care
of their parents and the adult authorities that govern our society. This young
generation is like the sheep in the above illustration and there exist a pack
of wolves ready to devour them. These wolves are the minority insisting on Same
Sex Marriage Equality and the Safe Schools Program.
I am frankly amazed and deeply
disillusioned at the caliber of leadership shown in this country, of the lack
of moral fiber and the ignorance and irresponsibility of authority figures over
this matter. As a child growing up I was
taught, perhaps naively, to trust authority figures like teachers, policemen,
and government officials, however today it is these very same authority figures
who are leading our children like the Pied Piper of Hamlin down to destruction
and I shake my head in disbelief at what I hear Churchmen and authority figures
saying. Where is their conscience? They sit and moralise over matters of
political correctness and then calmly perpetrate, possibly the worst crime of
betrayal in human history against the human race, second to obliterating
ourselves from the planet by nuclear explosion, through this monstrous
sociological experiment and with the sole purpose of destroying marriage, a God
ordained and God honouring institution made only between a man and a woman.
It is utterly perplexing to
think that people of the same gender should be interested in each other
sexually when both genders are so obviously different from each other and yet
complement each other perfectly biologically for the reproduction and nurture
of the social unit known as the family, that unit which makes up a society
which in turn makes up a nation.
Populist and faddish trends
among the young
Young people are still trying
to find their feet in a complex world and have not seen enough real experience
of life to be qualified to make such lofty social judgments that are required
on such an important matter as this. Often it is idealism and the excitement of
the untried and new that motivates the young in what can only be referred to as
a dangerous social experiment, the ramifications of which have not been made
clear. Because of their youth they see things often to their credit as grossly
unfair and their zeal for justice should be applauded; if only it were but
tempered with wisdom. However, rarely can you put an old head on young
shoulders and they unfortunately are populist and faddish in their opinions and
moral judgments, frequently leaping to the moral high ground advocating
tolerance non judgmentalism and a live and let live philosophy of life none of
which is wrong in and of itself except when it is ill informed and lacks the
clarity of discernment. For this reason I strongly advise against these young
people being included in what must surely be regarded as an illegal voting
procedure if their numbers are included simply to obtain a result. This is also
why every Australian of voting age should properly inform themselves about the
implications and ramifications of the subject and lodge their vote for the “No
campaign.”
Tolerance
There exists within the
Christian community the misguided belief that the demonstration of tolerance
evidences the depth of spirituality displayed. False spiritual pride leaves
many taking the high moral ground, leaving them feeling superior to the
minority who struggle to reconcile the acceptance of sinful lifestyles, things
that God calls sin, which they, the majority, seem happy to condone. Christians
do not have the prerogative to determine morality and contradict what the Word
of God says. Those who take the name Christian and contradict the Word of God,
saying times have changed and we must be more progressive, do a great
disservice to those who have an atheistic viewpoint.
Martin Luther 500th
anniversary of the Reformation
This week is the 500th
anniversary of the Protestant Reformation and many in Australia and around the
globe are commemorating this great event, but I wonder what this great man would
have to say to the church over its weak reaction to the same sex marriage
equality attack on Christian values? Again I am one hundred per cent sure he
would not agree with the new tolerance philosophy espoused by the post modernist
camp which is the majority of the church.
The Founding Fathers of the
Australian Constitution:
The political leadership give
lip service to the memory of the Founding Fathers and then seek to undo
everything that these great men sought to accomplish. Sir Edmund Barton and
Alfred Deakin the framers of the Australian Constitution would be horrified and
roll over in their graves knowing the proposed changes that are being made to
our society. The Anzacs, our fathers and grand fathers would also regret that
they spilled their blood and gave their lives for this worthless and unthankful
generation. I am damned sure they would not have fought to allow homosexuals
and lesbians to humiliate married couples and decent family values. I know my
Dad wouldn’t have, that’s for good and sure.
Goodness me. How did we ever
get someone like Christopher Pyne in our Government who seeks to rush through
legislation of such importance to our national ethos in two days. He even
angered members of his own party over his attitude and not for the first
time. (art. West Australian 30/10/2017).
The man is a walking, talking imbecile.
Politicians by their very
nature are populist in their views and opinions, to thus be popular, in order
to be elected, because if they are not elected they certainly cannot govern.
However, good governance is not about giving people what they want, but what is
morally and ethically good for them. Politicians who rush to ingratiate
themselves with the prevailing philosophy in order to be popular are like the
wall flower turned blushing bride who will take the first man they can find
with a similar ultimate end. Christopher Pyne and politicians of his ilk are
just like the blushing bride. It would be a positive step if these individuals
could step back and reflect on the immensely responsible nature and task of
good governance, and rather than pandering like salivating dogs for the
populist vote, instead seek to act like the dignified statesmen who founded the
Constitution.
What you do with cancer
Homosexuality and lesbianism
is a disease like cancer and when someone is diagnosed with cancer they do not
wish to entertain it in the body and thus they do everything they can to
eradicate it, allowing the surgeon’s knife to excise it from the body. If society condones this it will be like
allowing cancer to grow in our midst without trying to arrest it.
George Brandis’ false
assurances regarding freedom of speech and religion cannot be relied upon He
cannot give such assurances since they are subject to the views of the next
party in power and to do so is to mislead the voting public which he did on a
recent Q&A program. Sweden adopted same sex marriage equality seven years
ago giving similar assurances and as recently as this year have imposed
penalties on people who for conscience sake cannot agree with the legislation.
So much for government assurances,
diversity, inclusivity and
equality espoused by the young Grace Gouldstone, Duncraig, West Australian 30/10/2017- Refusal of the Ian Goodenough Award on
principle. The article is misguided and unethical; these words, Diversity,
inclusivity and equality in certain contexts are dirty words and dirty ill
thought out ideas. The West
Australian should be ashamed of itself using such a young and inexperienced
person to influence the West Australian public on a matter of such incredible
importance to the very nature of society and its very existence. This person is totally unqualified
to express such an influential opinion and could not possibly understand the
complex sociological issues and philosophy attached to the argument due to her
tender age. This does not reflect on her intellectual capability but simply seeks
to point out that life’s experiences are insufficient for her to make a qualified
comment. She is entitled to her opinion of course. The error from my judgment
lies with the editors who printed the story and they should be held
blameworthy.
The Hermaphrodite
Unlike those who willfully
deny their sexual gender such as those mentioned in the above paragraphs, the
poor unfortunates who are born with undefined sexual genitalia are deserving of
mercy and understanding. The harsh judgments directed toward the LGBT community
should not include the hermaphrodite who through no fault of their own, but
through a birth defect have difficulty in determining their true sexual gender
and for their entire life endure great anguish of soul, humiliation and vexing
questions that pursue them to their grave. Any kindness and understanding that
the rest of the community can offer such individuals would undoubtedly help to
ease their passage through this mortal existence. Their confusion over gender
may cause them to end up in the LGBT category and they may feel great anger and
disillusionment at what life has dished out to them. These individuals should
not have the things said of them that are made of those who deliberately and
rebelliously go against the order of nature.
The Condemnation of the
Approving Non Participant
Christopher Pyne by his comments
clearly shows his ignorance and lack of appreciation for the seriousness of the
sociological, religious, moral and
ethical arguments surrounding the Same Sex Marriage Equality issue and subjects
himself to the judgment of God as do all those who condone homosexual and
lesbian behaviour. It seems to be the gracious and Christian thing to do to be
tolerant and understanding, but the Book of Romans chapter 1:32 says that those
who approve of such things even if they don’t do them, fall under that judgment
(17-25). Christians are called to be loving, kind and considerate, however love
and kindness have been seriously misconstrued to the extent that vile sin can
be excused so as not to offend the sinner yet exclude the impact of the offense
from the wider community and more importantly from God himself. We should be
more concerned not to offend God than the minority voice who have brazenly
called into question the tolerance of the greater number who for conformity’s
sake and the grand gesture of tolerance have fallen for the evil lie and thus
risked the judgment of God upon the whole nation and the world.
Like It, Share It
No comments:
Post a Comment