Sunday, June 9, 2019

HISTORY IS THE NARRATIVE OF THE VICTORS, NOT THE VICTIMS; THE PROPAGANDA OF THE RULERS, NOT THE REALITY OF THEIR SUBJECTS. When It Comes To The Old Testament Account Of The Exodus From Egypt And The Conquering Of The Canaanites, Would We Expect Any Different? Unless people are survivors and educated there is no written record of anything and the only means people have today to validate written historical accounts is archaeological verification.

Happy Riches

Happy RichesAnswer requested by Adrian Pearce Spidle
The only people who do not accept the physical evidence that exists regarding the Exodus are the ignorati. The ignorati are those individuals who think that by possessing an ignorant quotient they can reject the EVIDENCE OF ISRAEL CROSSING THE RED SEA, because they were unable to come up with a theory of its existence; therefore, being the unscrupulous doubters that they are, they imagine falsehoods to foster, with which they can attempt to deceive the public; while threatening those who do not accept their nonsense, and who call their charades out for what they are. (People who have the truth have nothing to fear—not even death!)

The archaeological evidence that supports the Bible is insurmountable, so the deceivers adopt the view that it is best ignored. Fake news television networks ignore news and focus on propaganda that promotes the narrative they want people to believe. 1984 is alive and well today. Although there are some television programs that have taken the time to look into the evidence outside the official narrative—not history that you are supposed to believe because of what some scholar imagined existed; for many do not do real research.
Certain associations do not accept what is the truth because they are not the ones who are getting the kudos. Academic or scholarly envy is very real among those who pride themselves in the little bits of knowledge they believe they know about the Universe. Contradicting the official narrative in some quarters of academia, members of the Biblical Archaeological Society, exploring various sites that have been excavated, which indicate evidence of the Hebrew’s existence in Egypt, have also found that they can provide evidence for the Exodus having taken place—even if uncertain of the dates.
The question “Did the Exodus happen” then becomes “When did the Exodus happen?” This is another heated question. Although there is much debate, most people settle into two camps: They argue for either a 15th-century B.C.E. or 13th-century B.C.E. date for Israel’s Exodus from Egypt.— The Exodus: Fact or Fiction? - Biblical Archaeology Society
We have outlined above the chronological data in the Bible that demonstrate that the Exodus took place in 1446 BC. This is supported by evidence from Jericho, Ai and Hazor showing that all three sites were burned by fire at the end of the 15th century BC, the time frame for the Conquest based on a 1446 BC Exodus.
Truth for honest and scientific historians has two pillars: an accurate chronology based on absolute dates and reliable documents.
Gerard Gertoux writes:
However, according to most Egyptologists, there is absolutely no evidence of Moses and the Exodus in Egyptian documents, which leads them to conclude that the whole biblical story is a myth written for gullible people.
Ironically, if one considers that “truth” must be based on two pillars: an accurate chronology anchored on absolute dates (Herodotus’ principle) and reliable documents coming from critical editions (Thucydides’ principle), that implies an amazing conclusion: those who believe Egyptologists are actually the real gullible ones.
According to Egyptian accounts the last king of the 15th dynasty, named Apopi, “very pretty” in Hebrew that is Moses’ birth name (Ex 2:2), reigned 40 years in Egypt from 1613 to 1573 BCE, then 40 years later he met Seqenenre Taa the last pharaoh of the 17th dynasty and gave him an unspecified disturbing message.
The eldest son of Seqenenre Taa, Ahmose Sapaïr, who was crown prince died in a dramatic and unexplained way shortly before his father. Seqenenre Taa died in May 1533 BCE, after 11 years of reign, in dramatic and unclear circumstances.
The state of his mummy proves, however, that his body received severe injuries and remained abandoned for several days before being mummified, in agreement with Psalms 136:15. Prince Kamose, Seqenenre Taa's brother, assured interim of authority for 3 years and threatened attack the former pharaoh Apopi, new prince of Retenu (Palestine) who took the name Moses, according to Manetho, an Egyptian priest and historian. In the stele of the Tempest, Kamose also blames Apopi for all the disasters that come to fall upon Egypt, which caused many deaths.— Moses and the Exodus Chronological, Historical and Archaeological Evidence
While scholars, historians and archaeologists may disagree on what has happened in the past, the truth remains—they know very little. The evidence of Noah’s Ark and the Exodus Crossing is available today, but this cannot be admitted because it contradicts the official narrative of those who reject the truth. Besides this, professional pride does not permit the ignorati to accept that non-professionals have done what they were unable to achieve, so therefore this has to be dismissed and ignored.

No comments:

Post a Comment