Tet, Take Two:
Islam’s 2016 European Offensive
Islam’s 2016 European Offensive
By Matthew Bracken, November 2015
More
than a decade ago I wrote my first novel, Enemies Foreign and Domestic. Part of my motivation
was to establish my bona fides at
forecasting social, political and military trends. I didn’t like the direction
America was heading, and I wanted to warn as many readers as possible about
some of the dangers I saw coming. At the end of 2015, I hope that my past
success at prognostication will encourage people to pay heed to this essay.
As we
roll into the New Year, we are witnessing the prelude to the culmination of a
titanic struggle between three great actors. Three great social forces are now
set in motion for a 2016 showdown and collision that will, in historical terms,
be on par with the First and Second World Wars.
Two of
these great social forces are currently allied in a de facto coalition against
the third. They have forged an unwritten agreement to jointly murder the
weakest of the three forces while it is in their combined power to do so. One
of these two social forces would be content to share totalitarian control over
large swaths of the globe with the other remaining social force. One of these
social forces will never be satisfied until it achieves complete domination of
the entire planet. So what are these three great social forces? They are Islam,
international socialism, and nationalism.
Allow
me to explain the salient aspects of each, and how they relate to the coming
2016 cataclysm.
1. Islam
Islam
is similar to a self-replicating supercomputer virus. It is a hydra-headed
monster, designed by its creators to be an unstoppable formula for global
conquest. It’s almost impossible to eradicate, because it has no central brain
or control center. Islam is like a starfish: when you cut off a limb, another
grows to replace it. The names of the Muslim leaders, and the names of their
Islamic groups, are transitory and ultimately unimportant. Osama Bin Laden and
Al Qaeda are succeeded by Al-Baghdadi and the Islamic State, but they will all
pass from the scene and be replaced by others. While Muslim leaders and regimes
have come and gone, Islam itself has remained steadfastly at war with the
non-Muslim world for 1,400 years.
Islam
does not recognize secular national boundaries. To devout Muslims, there are
only two significant realms of the world. First is the Dar al-Islam — the House of Islam, which is the land
of the believers. The other is the Dar
al-Harb — the House of War, which must be made Islamic by any
means, including violent jihad. The expansion of Islam is sometimes held in
check for long periods, but more often Islam is on the march, acquiring new
territory. Once conquered by Islam, territory is rarely taken back, Spain being
a notable exception.
The
Muslim world produces almost no books or new inventions. Short of finding oil
under their feet, most Islamic nations are backward and impoverished. So
wherein lies the power source for Islam’s nearly constant expansion over the
past fourteen centuries? The motor and the battery of Islam are the Koran and
the Hadith, or sayings of Mohammed. A messianic Mahdi, Caliph or Ayatollah with
sufficient charisma can accelerate Islam’s pace of conquest, but individual men
are not the driving force.
Secular
“Muslim in name only” strongmen from Saddam Hussein to Muamar Qadafi can hold
Islamism in check for a period with brutal methods, but strongmen are often
assassinated or otherwise removed from power, and in any event, they cannot
live forever. Once the secular strongmen are gone, fanatical mullahs are able
to stir their zealous Muslim followers into sufficient ardor to reinstall a
radical Islamist regime under Sharia
Law, according to the Koran.
This
pattern of secular strongmen being followed by fanatical Islamist leaders has
recurred many times over the past millennium and longer. Do not be fooled by
modernists like King Abdullah of Jordan. To the true believer of Islam, any
king or strongman is never more than a rifle shot or grenade toss away from
being kinetically deposed, and replaced by another Islamist fanatic.
The
persistent virulence of Mohammed’s 7th Century plan for global domination means
that it is always ready to erupt in a fresh outbreak. Islam is like a brushfire
or ringworm infection: it is dead and barren within the ring, but flares up
where it parasitically feeds off the healthy non-Islamic societies around it.
What produces this uniquely fanatical motivation, from within nations and
peoples that otherwise seem devoid of energy and new ideas?
The
motivation lies within the words of the Koran and Hadith. Most simply
distilled, in the earthly realm, these Islamic texts offer immoral men sanction
for thrill-killing, looting, raping, and capturing infidel slaves, and when
these jihadists are killed, they are promised a perpetual orgy with seventy-two
nubile virgin slave girls in Mohammed’s sick, evil and perverted Muslim
paradise. Unlike the Jewish and Christian Bibles, the Koran and Hadith appeal
not to man’s better angels, but to the darkest aspects of human nature.
(Tellingly, Moses and Jesus are said to have climbed to mountaintops to
communicate with their God, while Mohammed received his messages from Allah
deep inside a bat cave.)
A meaningful
or permanent reformation of Islam is impossible, because a new generation of
fanatics, wielding the unexpurgated Koran and Hadith as their weapons, will
always declare the reformists to be apostates and murder them. In Islam, the
fanatics who are holding the unalterable Koran in one hand and a sword in the
other always stand ready to seize complete power and exterminate their enemies.
This
latent danger breeds fear and causes nearly all non-Muslims to be carefully
circumspect in their dealings with Muslims, lest they lose their heads at a
later date. This intentionally fostered fear of Islam is used as a cudgel
against those who would otherwise resist its domination. The immutable Koran is
the constant fountainhead of bloody Islamic conquest. Radical Islam is the pure
Islam, the Koranic Islam, the real Islam.
Anyone
who does not understand this bitter reality is dangerously ignorant of the past
1,400 years of human history.
2. International Socialism
The
second great actor or social force is international socialism. It can also be
aptly described under the rubrics of leftism, statism, cultural Marxism and
communism. These all inhabit the international socialist spectrum. I trace
these cultural Marxists at least back to the Jacobins of the 18th Century, a
clique of secular humanists who were early globalists aligned with Freemasonry.
The
Jacobins moved from Germany to France with a coherent and fully developed plan
to engineer a social explosion as a means to take power. The Jacobin
destabilization plan became the template for many more bloody “people’s
revolutions” to come. Following the French Revolution, we are familiar with
Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Mao. We are less familiar with the early 20th Century
British Fabian socialists, or the Italian Marxist theoretician Antonio Gramsci,
or the German “Frankfurt School” of international socialists, who transplanted
their vision to the United States via Columbia University.
Unlike
Vladimir Lenin and the Communists, they understood that international
socialism’s goals could not be fully accomplished until the strong edifice of
Western Civilization was hollowed out and sabotaged from within. In the end,
the clandestine international socialist forces which burrowed deep within the
Western womb achieved results which were far more permanent than the
militarily-imposed revolutionary “war Communism” of Lenin and Mao.
Over
the course of the past century, while Communism collapsed in the Soviet Union,
the Fabian socialists have been increasingly successful at poisoning the roots
of national, cultural and ethnic identity, leaving the inheritors of Western
Civilization disorganized and demoralized, with no central belief system to
rally behind. Why has this deliberate demoralization and dumbing-down process
occurred? The international socialists have believed at least since the French
Revolution that it was their duty to impose a top-down feudal order upon the
ordinary “dumb masses,” a new world order managed by self-proclaimed experts
chosen from among the correctly-educated elites, both for the benefit of the
ignoramuses, and as a way to line their own pockets and continue to live an
elite lifestyle of wealth and power.
It may
seem paradoxical that major corporate and banking interests are deeply invested
in the international socialist new world order, but when you untangle the
threads it actually makes perfect sense. Today’s international banks and
mega-corporations are powerful global actors in their own right, and they are
now written into each new international trade agreement. In fact, corporate
lawyers author most of the pages of the multi-thousand-page trade pacts, which
are now coming down like rain. Trade pacts which were never voted on by
American or European citizens, pacts which are taking on the force of
international treaty law, superseding even the United States Constitution.
From
the Rothschilds of Europe to the Warburgs of both continents, to the Morgans
and Rockefellers of America and back to the Hungarian immigrant George Soros,
for several centuries, millionaire (and more lately billionaire) bankers have
written their own laws and cut their own political deals. Today, they literally
create billions of new dollars and Euros per day out of thin air, and pass it
over to their cronies. In the United States, the creation a century ago of the
Federal Reserve — a privately run central bank of, by and for the interests of
a cabal of private banking interests — is a glaring case in point.
In the
USA, the heads of global mega-corporations and investment firms donate
massively to both the Democrats and the Republicans alike, ensuring favorable
treatment in an era of corporately directed crony capitalism. The picture is
much the same in other countries. These post-nationalist crony-capitalists
recognize no sovereign borders and believe that patriotism is a laughable
anachronism.
For
example, in America, open-border traitors bribe politicians to pass laws to
allow them to import unlimited numbers of H-1 visa foreign workers to directly
replace Americans at their very desks and work places, and these traitors do
not lose one wink of sleep over it. The traitor class of the international
business set calls this “agility,” moving fungible proles, peasants and paupers
worldwide to where they can be set to work most cheaply and profitably.
Ordinary American middle-class workers and their families are just collateral
damage in this process. The reality is not much different in Europe.
These
super wealthy open-border corporate and banking elites, who paradoxically steer
the forces driving international socialism, are able to bribe their way to
success after success in myriad ways. Their wealth and political connections
ensure that cooperative young players with future star quality are steered to
the right universities, foundations, councils, government agencies and media
positions. For example, when you see a talking head on television, and his
listed expert credential is that he is a member of the entirely private Council
on Foreign Relations who has written articles for their house publication Foreign Affairs, you will know that he
is destined for high positions, and doors will magically open in front of him.
Over on
the Fourth Estate, the global mass media have been almost entirely subverted,
scripted and stage-managed for decades by these über-wealthy elites through a
thousand channels greased with kickbacks, no-show jobs, and secret payoffs that
are disguised as special stock offerings and private land deals. Media figures
morph seamlessly into senior political advisors and corporate board members,
adding millions to their portfolios with each well-timed transition. Even many
retired generals and admirals eagerly wallow in this swamp of sell-out and
sleaze. It should not be a surprise to anyone that so many politicians leave
Washington or Brussels as millionaires. Just as it should not be a surprise
that long-time CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite, “the most trusted man in
America,” was for his entire adult life secretly a leading member of the World
Federalist Association, a fact he proudly revealed only after his retirement
from in front of the camera.
3. Nationalism
Nationalists
probably comprise most of the population of the non-Islamic world, but there is
no way to know their number with any certainty. Opinion polls are so easily
rigged that most of them are useless at best, and they primarily constitute
false propaganda and dezinformatsiya on
behalf of their sponsors.
Nationalists
consider themselves to be first and foremost loyal citizens of a sovereign
nation. However, it must be borne in mind that the very concept of nationhood
is fairly recent in origin. The division of the globe into distinct
nation-states only began in the 17th Century, usually marked by the Treaty of
Westphalia in 1648 at the end of the Thirty Years’ War. Since then, the world
has been divided by national borders, which often (but not always) coincided
with a national ethnic group, language and culture.
This
national division was particularly successful on the European continent. Shared
Judeo-Christian morality, ethics and values promoted notions of fairness and
equal rights, leading over time to the abolition of slavery, women’s rights,
and racial civil rights. During this period of unleashed human potential,
Europeans and Americans enjoyed the greatest increase in overall standards of
living ever seen in the history of mankind. Great cities, universities and
museums were constructed in Europe and in America. Rising European empires —
wealthy, cohesive, confident and highly organized — then conquered or otherwise
came to control colonies around the world. America picked up much of the
business when the colonial era ended after World War Two.
Happy
national outcomes were far from universal. During the 20th Century, Communism
rose to take complete power in some countries, notably Russia (as the Soviet
Union) and China, but their successes did not lead to an unstoppable avalanche
of global revolution, as had been foreseen by Lenin, Stalin and Mao. On the
other hand, the slow, grinding “Long March through the institutions” of the
traitor-class Fabian socialists (including Gramsci, the Frankfurt School and
others) proved far more effective and durable.
By the
21st Century, these cultural Marxist traitor-moles had subverted nearly all of academia,
inculcating generation after generation of students with a contempt bordering
on hatred for their own national and ethnic identities. Most of the media were
also subverted, ensuring that mass communications would always reinforce the
politically correct international socialist world view that had already been
injected and incubated in the schools and universities.
In this
era of mass-brainwashing by the cultural Marxists, Christianity was recast as a
retrograde social force, obsolete at best in the modern secular world, and at
worst an outright danger to humanity. In the new politically-correct secular
religion of humanism, European ethnic and cultural identity became the original
sin and the mark of Cain. White European skin meant white privilege, and was
transformed into a cause for shame.
Meanwhile,
emancipated European and American women aimed toward new goals, which
increasingly did not include producing a new generation, and demographic
collapse began. Both men and women alike were anesthetized into apathy with
24-hour entertainment transmitted by high-def screens and stereo ear buds
planted nearly into their brains. This unceasing fountain of entertainment
proved an ideal conduit for mass-brainwashing with politically-correct values
and ideas. Thus distracted and demoralized, most Americans and Europeans today
seem unable and unwilling to stand up and fight in defense of their diminishing
cultural and national identities. Brainwashed “social justice warriors,” the
latest iteration of Lenin’s “useful idiots,” hasten the demise of Western
Civilization, blissfully unaware of what will follow.
Thus
rendered supine, the remaining American and European nationalists constitute
the weakest and the most threatened of the three major global social forces. In
a few European nations, patriots such as Geert Wilders of the Netherlands,
Björn Höcke of Germany, Viktor Orbán of Hungary, Nigel Farage of the UK, and
Marine Le Pen of France lead a rear-guard defense of their national, ethnic and
cultural identities, while constantly being disparaged in the
socialist-controlled “liar press” as racists, Nazis and xenophobes.
4. World War Three
Going
into 2016, I believe that Europe is primed to become the central theater of a
third world war. Like an overstrained zipper suddenly failing and bursting open
from end to end, the European conflagration could well reignite simmering
conflicts from the Ukraine to the Persian Gulf, due to interlocking alliances
(NATO, including Turkey, vs. Russia), and the Sunni-Shia divide (Iran vs. Saudi
Arabia, which has been imported into Europe).
Yes,
World War Three. But why now?
A
recurring strategic doctrine of the open-border international socialists, going
back at least to the Jacobins, has been, “Out of chaos, order.” Lenin put it
this way, when told that there were bread riots in Russian cities: “The worse,
the better.” No “people’s revolution” (instigated and directed by traitor-class
elites) has ever occurred on full bellies in happy countries that were at
peace.
The
international bankers and corporate elites are just as happy to underwrite
revolutions as they are to underwrite other types of war. They have regularly
provided loans and armaments simultaneously to all sides of European conflicts,
always profiting handsomely no matter which side won or lost, or how many
people died. They have also funded revolutions, in order to stir the pot for
their future profits by getting in on the ground floor with new regimes.
For
example, American bankers funded the efforts of Lenin and Trotsky both before
and during their returns to Russia. Once you understand the grand machinations
at work behind the forces directing international socialism, this seeming
paradox actually makes sense. It’s about control, and brainwashing the idiot
proles into the unthinking herd behavior required to manage them under
socialism directed from above. But at the very pinnacle of the proletarian
worker-bee hive, the controlling nomenklatura elites
live like Communist dictators, or Rockefellers, or both at the same time, as
they meet at Davos, Aspen, Jackson Hole and elsewhere over champagne and caviar
to arrange their next self-dealing international trade agreements.
Now,
the elite shot-callers have lit the fuse for the vast social explosion that is
imminent in Europe, just as they did in Russia in 1917. How? By throwing
Europe’s borders wide open. The Islamist corner of my triad represents a
constant threat or push, and Muslims are always eager to fill any demographic
vacuum. Their avarice for fresh Islamic conquest is a given or a constant. We
see a 1.5-per birth rate among European women, and they see millions of
European women with no or worthless husbands, who will soon meet real Muslim men.
The current open-border policies of the European international socialists were
intentionally designed to allow hundreds of thousands of culturally and
religiously aggressive Islamist fighters and colonists to flood into Europe.
The European traitor elites understand exactly what they are doing. They know
what will happen. But why do it now?
The
twentieth-century Austrian School economist Ludwig Von Mises wrote, “There is
no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit
expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the
result of voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a
final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.” In contrast, when
the socialist economist John Maynard Keynes was asked if his self-styled
Keynesian credit expansion could continue in the long run, he replied, “In the
long run, we are all dead.” Tra-la-la,
who cares? It won’t be my problem.
In
2015, the childless homosexual John Maynard Keynes is indeed long dead, but we
are still alive, and his “long run” is finally upon us. Now, just before the
bank failures begin, seems to be an opportune time for the traitor elites to
throw over the table, scattering the cards, chips and cash, while the lights go
dark and shots ring out. The evil actors lurking in the background who
sometimes engineer major catastrophes always have a plan to escape their worst
consequences, including taking any blame, and they even have a plan to profit
from the very disasters they created. The first Baron Rothschild, around the
time of the Battle of Waterloo, is credited with saying “The time to buy is
when there is blood running in the streets.”
Is
there any evidence of a concerted effort to deliberately throw Europe into
bloody chaos and civil war? I think that there is. Thousand-passenger ferry
ships cost tens of thousands of Euros a day to operate. Muslim hijra (jihad by immigration) invaders are receiving free or
subsidized passage from Greek isles that are located only a few miles from
Turkey, all the way across the Aegean Sea to mainland Greece. From there,
chartered buses and special trains speed the migrants from border to border and
onward into Germany, France and Sweden, at little or no cost to the muhajirun, or hijra migrants.
Who is
paying for the operation of the ferry ships, trains and bus convoys? Who is
paying for the smart phones and prepaid debit cards? Who is passing out the
hundred-Euro notes seen in nearly every migrant hand, if they are truly
arriving destitute after escaping war-torn Syria? Somebody is underwriting the
Muslimhijra invasion
of Europe. George Soros is spending billions to fund a hundred groups
advocating open borders through his Open Society Foundation, so that might be a
good place for intrepid researchers to explore.
5. The Tet Offensive of 1968
As we
roll into 2016, I am reminded of the Vietnam War’s Tet Offensive. In January of
1968, before the Tet Lunar New Year celebrations, thousands of Viet Cong
fighters were infiltrated into Saigon and other South Vietnamese cities. Their
coordinated mass attacks on January 30 came nearly by complete surprise,
constituting America’s worst intelligence-gathering failure between 1950 in
Korea and 2001 in New York. The experts had all agreed that the VC were too
weakened and divided to accomplish mass attacks on a national scale, yet more
than 80,000 irregular Communist infiltrators simultaneously struck in more than
one hundred towns and cities. The Communists used a declared truce period to
launch their attacks, while the American and South Vietnamese forces were on
holiday leave. Bitter urban fighting in Hue, Vietnam’s third largest city,
lasted for a month. Before they were defeated in Hue, the Communists executed
thousands of civilian prisoners, dumping them into mass graves with their hands
wired behind their backs.
The
Communist bosses in North Vietnam miscalculated that the Viet Cong attacks in
the cities would trigger a spontaneous national uprising against the American
imperialists and their Republic of Vietnam puppets. This general uprising did
not take place, and the VC was largely wiped out by hard-fighting American and
South Vietnamese troops. City life went back to what constituted normal in
South Vietnam. After Tet, the Viet Cong were largely a spent force, and never
regained their former power. (The final takeover of South Vietnam in 1975 was
accomplished by conventional NVA troops arriving from the North in tanks and on
trucks, after Democrats in the American Congress cut off the resupply of
ordnance and fuel to our South Vietnamese allies, leaving them unable to defend
their republic.)
Yet
back in America, in order to deceive and demoralize America in time of war,
“Uncle Walter” Cronkite twisted the story of the Tet Offensive into a tale of
rising Communist power and reach, of American military failure, and of the
hopelessness of the cause to keep the Republic of Vietnam free from Communist
conquest. Why did Cronkite do this? “The most trusted man in America” was
secretly a leading propagandist for international socialism, which sees a
strong and independent United States as the greatest barrier to their goal of
eventual global governance. The case of Walter Cronkite and the Tet Offensive
false narrative is just one glaring example of the pervasiveness of the
international socialist grip on our mainstream media.
To an
American nationalist, Walter Cronkite is a classic traitor, but to a dedicated
international socialist, national borders and national sovereignty are no more
important than they are to a devout Muslim. To both supranational groups, borders
and nations are anachronistic constructs to be ignored, trampled, and discarded
over time. Cronkite was a traitor to America, but he is a hero to the cultural
Marxists. Typical of his dishonorable breed, Cronkite kept his true allegiance
a secret until after he had retired from broadcasting lies and propaganda. I am
convinced that the global mainstream media is infested with hundreds of Walter
Cronkites today, both in front of and behind the cameras.
6. Tet, Take Two
Which
brings me to the main thrust of this essay. I believe that Europe is being
prepared for a Muslim-jihad version of the 1968 Tet Offensive in Vietnam. A
vast and concerted act of treason has been taking place across Europe since the
creation of the European Union. Under the Schengen Agreement, Brussels promised
to guard the outer frontiers of the EU, while abolishing internal border
controls. The Eurocrat elites broke the first promise but kept the second, thus
opening a wide path for the onrushing Muslim hijra immigration invasion.
Right
now, approximately a million new Muslim migrants are engaged in a struggle to
find a warm place to sleep in a continent with nothing approaching the capacity
to adequately house them. At least 75% of the migrant invaders are Muslim men
of fighting age. Native-born ethnic Germans, Swedes and others are being thrown
onto the street to provide emergency housing for Muslim “refugees.” Tens of
thousands of migrants are currently living in tents, and in temporary shelters
like school gymnasiums and underused warehouses.
There
will be no means of finding or creating permanent quarters for them before the
Central European blizzards come. When the snow is deep in Germany and across
Europe, these men are going to enter local houses, demanding to be taken in as
boarders — or else. Where it is useful, small migrant children will be held up
in front as human shields for their emotional blackmail value, elsewise they
will be discarded. One way or the other, Muslim migrants will be attempting to
move inside of German homes and apartments seeking heat and food, and the young
Muslim men will be seeking undefended infidel or kafir women to slake their lust, (which is their right, under
Islamic Sharia law).
In
disarmed Europe, any group of a dozen or more cold, hungry and angry Muslim men
armed with clubs and knives will be able to enter any German house or business
that they like. Worse, there are now reports of vast quantities of firearms
being smuggled into Europe by the muhajirun, with
cowed European authorities afraid to search the migrants or their baggage, lest
they provoke riots. And weapons are not only smuggled in “refugee” baggage:
eight hundred assault-style shotguns were just seized in a single truck in
northern Italy, bound from Turkey to Belgium. How many truckloads of weapons
and explosives have notbeen
stopped?
In
Germany, even before the winter snows, the migrants are flash-mobbing and
looting shops and stores. Seeking to forestall a social eruption, police do not
respond until the mobs have safely departed. For now, the German government is
paying these store owners for their lost merchandise, but this cannot continue
forever. Businesses are closing and Germans are retreating in fear, as themuhajirun learn that they can invade private
property and rob Germans without repercussions, convincing them even further of
the docile passivity of their hosts, and the inevitability of their
ultimate hijra invasion
success.
As
attacks mount, the German police will nearly always fall out on the side of the
traitor-elite politicians who pay their salaries, and they will not come to the
rescue of besieged ethnic Germans. At least, not under official orders, or in
uniform. This calculated disregard by the international socialist elites for
the safety and welfare of ordinary German citizens will in time lead to
vigilantism and death squad actions by “off-duty” German military and police
personnel. They will be acting against their “hands off the Muslims” orders,
which are ultimately emanating from Brussels. And in time, enough firearms will
find their way from the military, police and black markets into the hands of
ordinary European nationalists for them to mount an armed resistance.
The
accelerated pace of the 2015 Muslim hijra invasion
was conceived, planned and executed by Quisling traitors comprising the elite
leadership of the European branch of the international socialist movement,
headquartered in Brussels. To paraphrase British nationalist patriot Paul
Weston, if a farmer deliberately inserts a fox into the henhouse, who is guilty
of killing the hens? Now, today, across Europe the stage is being set for the
genocide of the weak, confused and defenseless European hens. The former East
German Communist functionary Angela Merkel achieves high marks at both Muslim
fox insertion and German hen repression. (Meanwhile, the former Soviet
Communist KGB Colonel Vladimir Putin evolves to become a Russian nationalist
who always advances Russian interests, at least as they are perceived by
himself and his cronies.)
A few
days after the Paris attacks, French police commandos fired some 5,000 rounds
down an urban street into an apartment set into a crowded block. A year from
now, I predict that when police arrive on that street, they could be met with
sniper fire, improvised barricades, IEDs and possibly RPGs. In short, Paris,
Brussels and many other European cities will in time resemble Beirut during the
1980s.
To
understand Europe’s future, simply ask the Lebanese what follows when a nation
takes in tens of thousands of angry Muslim “refugees.” Civil war is what
happens, even if it begins among the various competing refugee factions. It is
a threadbare hope that a wished-for peaceful silent majority of Muslims will be
able to influence the radical Islamists away from violence, and thus forestall
the coming European Civil War, any more than imagined peaceful silent
majorities could have prevented the civil wars in Lebanon, Bosnia, Syria or a
dozen other places. Actual peace-loving Muslims will be as insignificant to the
outcome of the coming conflict as were any Quaker pacifists hiding in 1944
Berlin. The only significance of the alleged silent majority of peaceful
Muslims is that they will serve as living camouflage for the jihadists to hide
among.
It is
critical to note that none of the examples I just mentioned (Lebanon, Bosnia,
Syria) constituted neat bipolar wars between two national state actors. All
were three-sided wars — at least. These formulations are inherently unstable
and constantly veer toward violence, as temporary alliances of convenience
shift and today’s friend becomes tomorrow’s enemy. In this environment of
deception, subterfuge and betrayal, the false-flag terror operation becomes a
standard operating procedure. It is a simple matter for Group A to conduct a
massacre of Group B while wearing the outward uniforms or other insignia of
Group C. And it is no trouble at all for Group C to fire a few mortar rounds
into the market square of Group A from the territory of Group B. Ethnic
cleansing, reprisal operations and mass executions proliferate like mushrooms
in this free-booting environment, which is devoid of the behavioral controls
normally inherent in a war fought at the national level between two uniformed
militaries.
When
any non-Islamic country, such as France (through dangerously naive immigration
policies) attains approximately a ten-percent Muslim population, violence and
civil war become a constant threat. Ten percent of a total national population
translates into more than fifty percent of fighting-age men in key urban
districts, due to the concentration of Muslims in Sharia-zone ghettos, combined with aging European
demographics. Later, these Muslim ghettos will serve as sanctuaries and
bastions for the jihadists, until and unless they are finally pulverized with
artillery shell fire or aerial bombs. France and Germany will not be exempt
from the lessons of history that were hard-taught in Beirut, Sarajevo, and
Damascus.
Thousands
of the recent Muslim muhajirun currently
arriving in Europe were schooled in prolonged and savage religious and ethnic
civil wars. Today’s Europeans, deliberately brainwashed with politically
correct fairytales about the benefits of multi-culturalism, have utterly no
idea what horrors await them. Increasing European discomfort will not change
the outcome one iota. Just because the Europeans may tire of the irritating
presence of Muslims, (both new immigrants and native born), the Muslims will
never willingly leave Europe. Nor will the Muslim immigrant invaders knuckle
under and turn quiet and docile again.
7. A Score of Beslans
The
hard core of the battle-hardened jihadists now fanning out across Europe
understands the tried-and-true process of igniting a civil war through terror.
They will calculate that the European military and police cannot and will not
sustain the battle against an unceasing campaign of terrorism. Brussels cannot
remain on virtual lockdown forever without its economy being wrecked. What will
happen when a Paris-type attack, or worse, is a daily event in a dozen European
cities?
As I
mentioned above, just the other day in northern Italy eight hundred
combat-style pistol-grip shotguns were discovered in a truck on their way from
Turkey to Belgium. Do the math. The Paris attacks were carried out by
approximately eight jihadists armed with Kalashnikovs, shotguns and TATP
suicide vests (which can be manufactured anywhere there is a kitchen). Now
imagine a “Super Tet Offensive,” with every type of target on the hit list from
airports to zoological parks, each being assaulted by an eight-man squad of
such killers. Some attacks smaller, some larger, from pairs to platoons in
strength.
Today,
perhaps only a few short months prior to Tet 2016, there is no Islamic high
command located in Europe or elsewhere in charge of planning specific terror
operations. There is no OKW (Oberkommando der
Wehrmacht, the supreme command of the German Nazi armed forces) planning
an IslamicOperation Barbarossa,
hence, there is no command and control structure for Western intelligence to
penetrate and disrupt.
Instead
of a central brain directing many hands, think of a vast swarm of stinging jellyfish,
all moving in loose formation, with the same generalized attack plan in their
collective hive-mind. At the end of 2015, individual muhajirun may have only a basic awareness that
they are heading to Europe to conduct a great jihad. As D-Day draws nearer,
coded messages will proliferate with cryptic references to portentous events
from Islamic history. “Get ready, and prepare to conduct major operations” will
be the thrust of the online chatter and encrypted wireless messages. In each
European city, targets will be individually scouted by localmuhajirun in anticipation of a general outbreak of
jihad terror attacks.
How
many mosques have already received a truckload of shotguns or Kalashnikovs? Run
the numbers again: eight jihadists per terror attack, eight hundred weapons per
truck, 80,000 Viet Cong fighters in the original Tet Offensive, and an
estimated 800,000 muhajirun flooding
into Europe. Using radical mosques as clandestine armories is S.O.P in the
Middle East, so why would the jihadists not use the same tactics in safe and
docile Europe? Out of a sense of fairness and respect for European laws?
Please. In the words of Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan, “The mosques are our
barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our
soldiers…” And bear in mind that anyplace an AK-47 can be smuggled, so too can
a few kilos of Semtex.
Imagine
a dozen or even a score of Beslan-type school sieges, all happening at the same
time, across that number of European cities. Initially, the first string of
major surprise attacks will be coordinated by the most well-organized terror
networks using currently unbreakable wireless encryption. Many of the attacks
will involve numerous captured hostages, often children, with impossible
demands being made to guarantee their safety. Or no demands will be made; just
rape and slaughter will ensue, as in the Russian Beslan example. This outbreak
of major attacks will be the signal for the general jihad offensive to begin.
The
Beslan Massacre happened in 2004 at the hands of yet another killer gang of
aggrieved Islamists. Two squads of Chechen Muslim terrorists arrived on the first
day of school in a Russian town, using false police vans as camouflage. They
took a thousand young hostages and held them for three days. The Muslim
terrorists murdered over four hundred innocents, often after rape and torture.
Now, imagine twenty ongoing European Beslans, with simultaneous infrastructure
and “soft-target” (people) attacks happening everywhere in between.
What
Hitler’s Nazis accomplished with Stukas and Tigers and motorized divisions, the
Islamonazis will attempt to accomplish by a massive “Tet Offensive on
steroids,” overwhelming and stunning the European meta-system into immediate
paralysis and first psychological, then material defeat. At least, that is the
outcome that the Islamonazis will be striving to achieve. The 1968 Tet infiltration
and mass-attack strategy didn’t succeed in Vietnam, and maybe it won’t work in
Europe, either. It’s more likely that the hoped-for general uprising by all
European Muslims against the kuffar will
not be triggered, and it may simply stall and sputter out.
In
strategic terms, if nothing else, the 2016 jihad offensive and subsequent civil
war in Europe will open up a second major front in the war against the Islamic
State, causing NATO and the West to turn their attention inward toward their
own survival, and thereby take pressure off the other theaters of war in Iraq
and Syria.
And for
the Europeans to win the coming civil war, they will have to be at least half
as brutally ugly as their Muslim invaders, and that means pretty damn brutally
ugly. But while the jihadists will be operating at maximum brutality from day
one, the placid and polite European authorities will be starting from far
behind in that department. For example: a standard jihadist tactic is to flee
from a terror attack straight back into the embrace of their co-religionists in
theSharia-zone ghettos, and hide
behind their women and children. Then what will the authorities do? Go in and
try to arrest them? (Just joking.) Wait for their next excursion with more
terror bombs? Or gut the entire suspected block with shell fire? This is what I
mean by damn ugly. The French reaction to the Paris attacks gives a hint of how
this phase will run.
Best
case scenario, and I don’t see this as likely: the 2016 Islamic Tet attackers
will be wiped out the way the Viet Cong were in 1968. But if there are enough
simultaneous attacks, in total numbers involving anywhere near the 80,000 or so
fighters of the Vietnamese Tet, I can’t see how the present European forces can
defeat the jihadists in less than a month, if at all. By very simple math, that
number of jihadists means ten thousand Paris-level attacks. Think about that.
Ten thousand Paris level attacks! All taking place in the same month, the same
week, even on the same day, right across Europe. The politically-correct and
overly polite European policemen (and even their militaries, at first) won’t be
up to mounting successful counterattacks and rescue operations against a score
of Beslans happening in schools, hospitals and concert halls. Not while at the same
time, airports, train stations, power plants and other targets are being hit by
Paris-sized terror squads right across Europe.
And
count on this, for it is a standard tactic used by all Islamonazis in this
extremely dirty style of warfare: just like in Beslan in 2004, where the
killers arrived in false police vans, in 2016, ambulances, emergency vehicles
and other official conveyances will either be hijacked or painted to simulate
the real thing. Suicide bombers will arrive in official uniforms to sneak past
security. This is a standard tactic, I repeat for emphasis. A jihadist dressed
in a policeman’s uniform will drive a hundred-kilo bomb straight into the
police headquarters in an official, marked police car. Goodbye, police HQ. (And
incidentally, good luck at planning the rescue operation for your town’s local
Beslan-in-progress, after your local police HQ is cratered, and much of their
crisis leadership is wiped out.)
A few
examples; I could go on for pages. The milk truck or bakery van will deliver
terrorists to the middle school at mealtime. An ambulance will pull into the
hospital’s underground parking garage and detonate. The cement truck won’t be
delivering cement. Muslim jihadists are very proud of coming up with ever more
clever ways to fool stupid infidels by abusing their naïve faith in official
uniforms and corporate logos. The jihadists hurry to sign up for suicide driver
school, just for the prospect of exploding a massive bomb inside of a crowd of
filthy kuffar, and
launching themselves straight into the arms of their seventy-two waiting
virgins. This is how they will fight in Tet 2016. Forget this lesson at your
extreme peril.
Another
painful European history lesson has been largely forgotten since the days of
the Troubles in Northern Ireland. In the 1990s, the IRA forced the British to
the peace table when it became clear to all parties involved that the Brits
could not prevent car bombs from exploding in the heart of the London financial
district, costing billions in repair and lost-opportunity costs after each new
blast. Essentially, a competent terrorist organization can hold a modern city
hostage in this manner.
A few
dozen to a hundred (at most) active IRA terrorist fighters managed to pull off
this feat. And they were not even trying to kill people; rather, their goal was
to wreck important office towers, with the British economy as their primary
target. Usually, the IRA detonated their London car bombs during off-hours in
these final terror actions of the Irish Troubles. The Muslim car bombers will
not be as considerate in the coming European Civil War. They will strike for
maximum civilian casualties, in an attempt to terrorize European leaders into
surrender and submission to their Islamist demands.
8. Hama Rules
I
predict that the unfolding European Civil War (after the initial Tet 2016 phase)
will comprise a steady escalation from Paris-style rifle attacks and suicide
bombers, to snipers, to IEDs, to car and truck bombs. This is why I mentioned
the possibility of eventually reducing the Sharia-zone ghettos to ruins by air and artillery bombardment.
This will indeed happen, after the car bombs begin to explode in European
cities. At that point, an urban civil war loses any vestige of civilized norms.
Fortified ghetto bastions that provide sanctuary to Muslim jihad terrorists
will be destroyed if the Islamic conquest is to be quelled.
This
type of no-quarter urban warfare already has a name, “Hama Rules,” from the
1982 obliteration of that Syrian town. Hama was a Muslim Brotherhood stronghold
used to launch attacks against the regime of Hafez al-Assad, the father of the
current Syrian strongman. These guerrilla (or terrorist if you prefer) attacks
occurred beginning in 1976, and didn’t stop until Hama was reduced to rubble,
and at least ten thousand Sunni Muslim Syrians were killed among the ruins.
If the
Europeans don’t have the stomach for that level and scale of total civil war,
then over time they will be defeated, and either forced to convert to Islam, or
forced into subjugated dhimmi status,
or they will be executed, (if they can’t be put to useful work as slave
laborers first). Those are Islam’s unchanging options for defeated male foes,
at the pleasure of their Muslim vanquishers. The captured girls and women of
the defeated kuffar will
be taken as slaves, that is a given. So it will be war to the knife, and knife
to the hilt, with no holds barred, and no quarter asked or given.
Going
into 2016, a peaceful de-escalation is improbable, not with up to a million
fresh muhajirun of
fighting age currently cast all about Europe without housing or prospects as
winter comes on. This rapid mass influx of hundreds of thousands of unattached
Muslim men into Europe is the equivalent of pouring a jug of nitroglycerin down
the barrel of a cannon, then loading a double gunpowder charge, ramrodding three
or four cannon balls on top, and lighting the fuse. It is the perfect recipe
for a disastrous explosion.
The
1968 Tet Offensive involved approximately 80,000 armed Viet Cong infiltrators
sneaking into Vietnamese cities and towns, (unnoticed by the “experts” in
intelligence, I will add.) How many of the almost a million muhajirunnow loose in Europe will take up arms for the
cause, after the first initiating wave of Tet 2016 terror attacks? Does anybody
really have any idea? There is a point when stealthy hijra transitions into overt jihad, and I believe this will occur in the coming year. Historians
will look back and marvel at what I think of as the coming European Jihad Tet
Offensive of 2016. Or perhaps they will call it the European Trojan Horse Civil
War. (I only hope that they don’t call it The Final Islamic Conquest of
Europe.)
Historians
will study how this mass hijra invasion,
and the consequent Tet 2016 and European Civil War came to happen. The truth is
it was an inside job by the traitor class, the cultural Marxist open-border
international socialists. First, they numbed and dulled their own compatriots
into apathy, before opening the gates to the Islamist barbarians. They injected
the paralyzing curare of
multi-cultural political correctness into their own societies, in order to
render them unable to defend themselves from the planned attack.
In
reality, the international socialists and the Islamist forces have agreed upon
a murder pact, wherein their common enemy, the nationalists, will be removed as
a threat to either of them forever. In 2016, European nations will deliberately
be torched, in order to finish off their people’s last remaining notions of
national pride and cultural identity. In effect, the coming conflict will
constitute an agreement about the dinner menu made between a jackal, a hyena,
and a supremely stupid bliss-ninny lamb, who was raised on Utopian
multi-cultural fantasies. The lamb believes that by its own sweet example, the
jackal and the hyena can be turned into vegetarians — but the choice for the
dinner entree is already a foregone conclusion. European nationalists will be
shot and stabbed in their fronts and their backs until they go down and are
consumed by both of their rapacious destroyers.
And
depend on this: standing before the crater, in front of the smoking building,
after the tenth car bomb to explode that month, telegenic media traitors will
mangle the truth into a false narrative that supports the inexorable spread of
international socialism as the only possible solution to the “tragic cycle of
violence.” The liar press will call patriots Nazis, and Nazis patriots; they
will damn saints and praise mass-murderers. These media presstitutes are loyal
only to their traitor-class paymasters, and to their common international
socialist vision of global tyranny imposed from above by the all-knowing
elites. “Out of chaos, order,” will be in their minds if not on their lips.
9. The End Game
If the
traitor elites can imagine sufficiently far into the future, then they must
surely see international socialism lining up next for its climactic struggle
against Islam, which shall be fought atop the still-warm corpse of European
nationalism. Will these traitor-elite international socialists be able to hold
the line against the ultimate victory of Islamic supremacism in Europe, or
anywhere? Let us compare their assets and armaments.
The
traitor elites control vast wealth and many levers of power. But will the ready
offer of unlimited wealth and fast-track career promotion outweigh the fear of
the Muslim assassin, kidnapper, and beheader? Which motivating force will prove
stronger in the long run, the proffered bribe, or the kidnapped child and her
threatened decapitation? International socialism and world Islamism are both
evil totalitarian ideologies rooted in a quest for absolute power, but I
believe that more socialists will convert to Islam than the other way around,
tending to tip the final outcome in that direction. Why? Because you can live
without accepting a suitcase full of Euros or a juicy job offer as a bribe. But
you cannot live with your head removed from your shoulders.
Another
enduring but rarely examined weapon in the Islamic conquest armory is the offer
of amnesty to well-placed infidel leaders who agree to convert to Mohammedism.
Can I see Angela Merkel wearing a hijab? Yes,
certainly. Whether the badge she wears on her suit is red or black won’t matter
to the former Communist, not if it is a matter of saving her neck while
retaining her status. Study the history of Islamic conquest, and you will find
numerous cases where Western leaders announced — after clandestinely opening
the city gates tohijra invasion
— that they had already converted to Islam.
As
reward for this valuable service, well-placed defectors to Islam are often
allowed to preserve their wealth and positions by taking fresh Muslim names and
swearing fealty to the new Islamic regime. It’s intentionally made very easy to
convert to Islam. The shahada conversion
prayer is only a sentence, a handful of words. Sincere inner belief is not
required, only publicly outward submission, which is the true (and nearly
always obscured) meaning of the Arabic word Islam. Submission.
So when
it comes to last-stand defenses, and head chopping time draws near, will the
secular humanist international socialists fight to their last breath against
Islamism? Not likely, not when simply repeating a silly and trite incantation
about Allah and Mohammed can save their inherently dishonorable and traitorous
lives. Simply stated, they will submit to Islam.
I think
that in the end, Mohammed’s evil and satanic Koranic blueprint for world
conquest will prove to be even more virulent and persistent than the evil and
satanic blueprint of the international socialists, going back through the
Jacobins, Marxists and Communists. The unchanging Koranic blueprint for global
domination is still replicating and advancing after fourteen centuries, while
the international socialist blueprint is only two and a half centuries old.
Based on proven longevity alone, a betting man would have to favor the Islamic
formulation for conquest and tyranny over the international socialist version.
And in
the event that Islam either destroys or co-opts international socialism, I
would expect the strife to continue until only Sunni or Shia Muslims are left
alive. Then there would arise schisms and conflicts among new competing sects,
because of the innately violent instructions central to the Koranic blueprint.
But without an external host for the parasitic Islamic ringworm to feed upon,
(having killed and consumed the golden goose of productive Western society),
Islam itself will most likely fester and decay. What would succeed a failed
global Caliphate, I can’t imagine. By that time, the last believing and
practicing Christians in Europe will be lying cold and forgotten in their
unmarked mass graves.
10. Alternative Endings
But
perhaps the conflict between the three major forces will turn out differently.
Perhaps, after the Islamic Tet Offensive of 2016 is turned back, European nationalism
will experience a miraculous resurgence, following a rejection of the
international socialism which dragged the EU nations toward disaster. Sometimes
invading forces badly miscalculate their chances and underestimate the resolve
of their enemies, and after sweeping to early success, they are rolled far back
from their high-water marks. Napoleon and Hitler in Russia, and the Greek
experience in Anatolian Turkey from 1919 to 1922 come readily to mind.
Or
perhaps the Islamists will take their jihad a step too far, and a nuclear
device or other WMD set off in a Western city might finally provoke a
commensurate counter-strike against the nexus of Islam in Mecca and other
Muslim holy sites, such as Karbala in Iraq. Certainly Vladimir Putin can be
expected to evince more steely-eyed resolve than the current crop of effete and
dithering Western European leaders.
Two of
the Five Pillars of Islam literally revolve around the black moon rock set into
the corner of the Kaaba in the center of Mecca. After 1,400 unchanging years,
Islam cannot simply erase two of its five pillars and continue with business as
usual. Allahu Akbar means
our god is greater. If Mecca were turned into a vast, glowing crater, this
would be visibly untrue. When the Aztec and Inca man-gods were visibly thrown
down by the Spanish conquistadors, those religions and social systems
collapsed. If Mecca were to be destroyed, eliminating two of the five pillars,
it’s an open question as to what would happen in and to the worldwide Muslim
community. “We used to think our god was greater” won’t be an effective
rallying cry. But I don’t suppose I’ll be around to see how this all plays out.
For 1,400 years, uncounted millions of Christians and other infidels have died
not knowing if Islam would ultimately prevail or be vanquished.
I’m not
sure if there is a future ahead for sovereign nation-states as they have been
constituted for the past four centuries, especially nations with their own
unique histories, cultures and languages. I don’t know if the wealth and
influence of the traitor-elite international socialists can overcome the
constant threat of terrorism contained within the deadly Koranic conquest plan.
And when it comes to how the approaching European storm will affect China and
Asia, my crystal ball is cloudy on the other side. It’s hard to imagine a world
war extending from Scandinavia to the Persian Gulf not going nuclear at some
point. Perhaps the patient and cautious Chinese will simply inherit the ruins
of the West. Perhaps they will be drawn into the world war.
No
matter what else happens over the coming decade, 2016 is shaping up to be an
epic year in European and world history. I hope that whatever develops across
the Atlantic might at least provide clear lessons that will be valuable for the
defense of a free and sovereign United States of America. Including lessons
about the extreme danger of importing millions of Islamic muhajirun.
And
lastly, thank God — through our Founding Fathers — for the First and Second
Amendments to the United States Constitution. Unlike the Europeans, we are at
least still free to warn one another of impending dangers, without our being
silenced by the traitor elites who operate the levers of state power. And
because of the Second Amendment, we will never be pulled down to the ground
like helpless lambs by the Islamist hyenas and socialist jackals. When
one-too-many ravenous foxes are placed into the henhouse by socialist traitors,
in due time both the foxes and the traitors might just get a face full of
buckshot.
Just
remember: never, ever give up your guns.
You’re
going to need them.
Matthew Bracken was born in Baltimore, Maryland in 1957, and
attended the University of Virginia, where he received a BA in Russian Studies
and was commissioned as a naval officer in 1979. Later in that year he
graduated from Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training, and in 1983 he led a
Naval Special Warfare detachment to Beirut, Lebanon. Since then he’s been a welder,
boat builder, charter captain, ocean sailor, essayist and novelist. He lives in
Florida. Links to his short stories and essays may be found at
EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com
Originally posted on November 30, 2015 by Baron Bodissey
No comments:
Post a Comment