Friday, October 20, 2017

IRRATIONAL BELIEFS ARE THE DOMAIN OF ATHEISTS AND AGNOSTICS WHO REJECT THE EXISTENCE OF THE CERTAINTY OF A CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE. Atheists Like To Think That They Are Truly Intelligent When Rejecting The Creator Who Will Be Their Judge, While Agnostics Think They Are Being Intellectually Cute By Expressing Their Uncertainty. The fact that the blue sky appears every day is evidence of our Creator, because it does not appear by chance.


Belief is the basis of being human. How could we be human beings and not believe that we are homo sapiens? Yet some humans do not like being homo sapiens; instead, they think they are stars—even super stars—and beyond being a mere Earthling.

We have to believe the meaning of a word to be true before we can begin to use it in our thoughts. Moreover, we have to believe that the person to whom we are talking understands the meaning of the words we use, if we are to be understood. The person understanding us has to believe that they understand what it is that we have said, even though in all probability what the person thinks that we stated was not exactly what we meant.

To believe something is to accept an idea or what we have understood we have heard or read, or actually saw happen before our very eyes as true. Whatever the case, the truth of what was seen, heard or read may not correspond with the idea that formed in our mind.

Logic is often used to refute irrational ideas; that is, unsound, illogical, insane beliefs. But logic based on wrong assumptions comes up with irrational conclusions even though the method might work.
Two ways I know work when challenging irrational ideas are:
  • Experimentation: whereupon the irrational idea is disproved sufficiently to convince the holder that it is time to let go.
  • Creating sufficient pain in respect to the irrational idea so that the person instantly rejects the idea or every time the person returns to the idea pain becomes more intense until the idea is let go.

Still, people often want to resist the obvious and persevere with the pain. This is especially the case if the person finds pleasure in an idea or becomes a masochist and begins enjoying the pain. In which case, an oblique means may be required to penetrate the locus of thought rather than a frontal assault using (what is perceived to be) commonsense.

Distraction is a common means of assisting people to release irrational ideas that are not true—especially if the person can be distracted sufficiently to create a new interest that becomes stronger than the unreasonable belief held, so that it is overcome.

Students indoctrinated into irrational belief systems during their college years, often caste those false concepts aside when they discover that they have to become responsible for their own actions, and rewards only come when work is performed to obtain benefits.

Truths in life are irreversible. Anybody who thinks that being born to die has meaning is called a fool by those who see no wisdom in being born to die—especially if suffering has to be experienced in between.
Buddha sought to avoid suffering. The four noble truths of Buddhism focus on suffering and the means of avoiding them.

Jesus of Nazareth basically said that suffering was unavoidable—so bring it on! He further stated that if you follow me, I will show you the truth, for I have the power over death. What Christians call the foolishness of the Cross becomes the wisdom of God for sorting out those who seek the truth, in the hope that they might become wise.

People without a goal have no purpose. People without an eternal purpose face futility regardless of what their goal might be in this life. Pontificating about what a person has not got is like a dog chasing its tail and a yacht attempting to catch the wind without a sail. If you have not got eternal life, you had better get it before arguing about how smart you are for not having it. Why be irrational and say that eternal life does not exist when it is conceivable?

People with irrational beliefs reject the fact that if a Creator exists then only fools do not seek to find out why they are born to die and have to suffer emotionally when they cannot see what causes them to do so. Those with irrational beliefs claim that they only believe in what they can see. Apparently, they believe the sky is blue and the sun always shines. Whereas those who are rational accept that they did not ask to be born into world of suffering only to die, and seek to know why the blue sky does not really exist, and how it is that they are affected by emotions, when they cannot see the very words that cause them to be so affected.

In the beginning was the WORD—a very powerful statement. And the Word was with God and the Word was God. He was in the beginning within God. All things were made through Him and there was nothing made that was made without Him. And this has nothing to do with a big bang; rather, more to do with what could become the worm that never dies. Any hope of understanding this begins only when a person realizes that emotions are non-existent without a word; just as no emotional pain would be felt if there were not a corresponding word to activate it. If you do not believe me. Just stop it!! I am telling you the truth!

The Only Words Written By The Finger Of God Exist So You Can Possess Life

MORAL DECLINE OCCURS WHEN RELATIONSHIPS BEGIN TO FRACTURE. Yet People Reject The Historical Narrative That Exists Within The Bible That Immorality Leads To Ruin And Even Cessation Of Existence. Israel has been resurrected as a nation, but not other civilizations that have been buried in the tomb of history.


Happy Riches Happy Riches Answers request by Bob Branham

Morality is about relationships. Moral decline occurs when relationships begin to fracture. Relationships that are long lasting and based upon the desire to appreciate one another’s contributions without making egregious detrimental demands that fracture commitments are the basis of a healthy society.

A review of history indicates that nations have either been defeated because greater forces have subdued them or they appear to have crumbled from within. One of the reasons nations have collapsed is because of the corruption that has permeated the community. Nevertheless, here are eight reasons attributed to the fall of the Roman Empire:
  1. Invasions by Barbarian tribes
  2. Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor
  3. The rise of the Eastern Empire
  4. Overexpansion and military overspending
  5. Government corruption and political instability
  6. The arrival of the Huns and the migration of the Barbarian tribes
  7. Christianity and the loss of traditional values
  8. Weakening of the Roman legions
Evan Andrews, writing for the History Blog, states: “the decline of Rome dovetailed with the spread of Christianity, and some have argued that the rise of a new faith helped contribute to the empire’s fall.” Evan Andrews even enjoys a song to this effect.

Andrew Howley of the National Geographic Society, reporting on an ancient civilization conference convened in Guatemala, points to the effects of deforestation on the collapse of civilization. Deforestation could have been due to population explosion or drought or some other major catastrophe.

Anyone who implies that people following the teachings of Jesus is the reason Rome declined has to be demonstrating ignorance. For from the Bible we learn that when people remove themselves from the truth that God is the source of our life and existence, then moral decadence will flourish (Romans 1:22-32) and with it the breakdown of society.

Moral decadence leads people to forsake the very institution that keeps society intact, the family. Once people forsake honoring the family, then this is the beginning of the end of a civilization. Family instills commitment within relationships.

Confucian has played a major part in the general Chinese ethos over the last 2,500 years. The exemption, perhaps, being the communist era; even now, many people still hold to Confucian tradition. (Robert Oxnam et al) state in The Three Confucian Values
In the Confucian tradition, human relatedness is the primary given. Human beings exist in a social context. They learn from one another, they interact with one another.
Consequently the family is seen as the very core of society where children learn their obligation to their parents and how to relate to other members of the family.

Moses appeared on the scene some 3,500 years ago. God called Moses to be the human mediator of His will for the Israelites and, more generally, mankind. The Omniscient God desires that people do not transgress what is expressed in the Ten Commandments. The first five of those commandments relate to God Himself, speak of the environment, and point to how nations will implode. The next five commandments speak of the individuals requirements for relating to other people and how each one ought to think if everyone is to enjoy community. Violating these injunctions would incur disaster.

In the teachings of Jesus, we see what is required of people who are to possess eternal life. We also learn what is required of people if they are to live in peace on Earth. There is no difference in Jesus teachings and what is found in the Ten Commandments when it comes to morality. The New Testament epistles expand on what Jesus taught and emphasize that the law (Ten Commandments) is good and needs to be upheld.
  • Now if I do what I do not want, I agree that the law is good. (Romans 7:16)
  • Now we know that the law is good, if any one uses it lawfully. (1 Timothy 1:8)
Any community, any culture, any nation, any civilization will become brittle, just like a fragile fractured vase, if it becomes morally crazed. However, when people repent of their rejection of what is good, what is right, and what is true, to then acknowledge the truth and teach the fundamentals of harmonious relationships to children, based upon the core element of family within society, then it is possible to expunge corruption from its midst.

Honesty, truthfulness and virtue only exist when justice is acknowledged and upheld. Faith, justice and mercy are very important elements within a prosperous society that ensure its prosperity. Justice, mercy and faith are taught within family interactions as individuals learn to interact, overcome misunderstandings and enjoy the unity of a well-run household. Of course, this has to be adhered to when people are attending schools; when they are participating in the workplace; when they are involved in government operations. But when people throw out the Ten Commandments, this is not going to happen, society is going to become more corrupt and decadence will ensure the breakdown of every relationship.

The Ten Commandments Were Designed For You To Enjoy And Possess Life

LIKE IT, PLEASE SHARE IT

Thursday, October 19, 2017

MANY PEOPLE, WHO CALL THEMSELVES ATHEISTS, ARE VERY THINNED-SKIN PEOPLE WHO DO NOT APPRECIATE THAT A REAL ATHEIST KILLS AND TORTURES PEOPLE WITHOUT COMPUNCTION. Why Does The Bible Call People Who Say There Is No God, Fools, And Does This Include Atheists, Or Are Fools Those Who Seek God Out? The atheist thinks the fool is the one who finds the truth that God exists and the blue sky did not appear by chance, for if it did, it would not be there every day, when there are no clouds to cover it.

Why does the Bible call people who say there is no God, fools, and does this include atheists, or are fools those who seek God out?
Some claim that the Bible does not refer to atheists; therefore, when the Bible refers to fools this does not include atheists as being fools.
So what is an atheist? Is an atheist a fool?
My understanding is an atheist is someone who does not believe that God exists. Atheists say that there is no God because they prefer to think that there is no God.
Does the modern-day idea of an atheist concur with the biblical concept of a fool?
Here are three definitions:
Atheism:
“Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods.”
(American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2011)
 Atheist:
“A person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being.”
(Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, © 2010)
“A person who does not believe in God or gods.”
(Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014)
Clearly, the current definition concurs with my understanding of an atheist: someone who does not accept that the Almighty Creator God, the Supreme Being exists.
The Bible states:
The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none that does good. The Lord looks down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there are any that act wisely, that seek after God. (Psalm 14:1-2)
In the pride of his countenance the wicked does not seek him; all his thoughts are, “There is no God.” (Psalm 10:4)
To suggest that the above verses do not describe modern-day atheists; we could say is a specious attempt by a clown trying to hoodwink the gullible.
An atheist could either be very immoral and possess no principles at all or be immoral as far as God is concerned because he or she is full of pride, has his or her own standards, and thinks to ignore the Omniscient One (by outrunning death at the final bell?).
Atheists are people whom the Bible calls, “Fools.” Some people are so precious they are offended by that. Bear in mind, offense is always taken and never given. (Since the Bible gives no person permission to take offense at what is written therein, if you do take offense, you are stealing.) The Bible records Jesus as saying that those who take no offense are blessed.
When I was a fool, I used to take offense. Now I know a fool ceases to be one when he or she becomes wise. A wise person would seek to find the reason why one is here on this Earth merely to be born, experience suffering in its various forms, then die, and yet be capable of mental torment by formulating the concept of eternity.
Atheists do not believe that God exists. Therefore, they believe they are not accountable for their actions to any Judge once they die. This is why the Bible views people as fools when they say that there is no God; especially, when they believe they will not have to give an account of their actions to a Superior Being—such as a Supreme Being with an Omniscient Mind who judges with righteousness and not with partiality as the corrupt in this world do.
If you show an atheist a video of a woman in the process of being healed from lip cancer, caught on film in real time, because of a divine pronouncement by a man, the atheist would not believe what he saw.
If you showed an atheist a fragment of bone and said that this came from a giant creature that weighed 40 ton and lived 40 million years ago, as long as you said that this creature’s existence occurred by an evolutionary process that relies upon chance, the atheist would believe you.
If you took three balls and told an atheist you are going do five things with them; he or she would at least listen to see what kind of juggling trick you proposed (James Randy would, anyway). You could tell the atheist what you are going to do along the following lines:
1. You are going to throw one ball into the air and it is going to remain stationary.
2. You are going to then get a ball and cause it to spin on your finger.
3. Then you are going to take a third ball and cause it to circle the one on your finger.
4. Having done that, you are going to take the ball circling the spinning ball that is on your finger and toss them into the air so that together they will circle the stationary ball.
5. Then this is going to continue for ten minutes without any strings attached.
The atheist would say that is impossible. If that were to happen that would be a miracle.
Yet the Creator of the Universe has the a moon circling the planet Earth that spins on its axis and together they travel at nearly 70, 000 miles around the Sun every 365.4 days and, evidently, these objects have been doing so for much longer than a mere ten minutes. However, the atheist says that this incredible marvel is merely a result of chance.
If you were to show a fool a marvel, the fool would not believe it was designed but had to happen by chance. Yet it would have to be a miracle that by chance the Earth spins on its axis and the moon circles the Earth. This is why the Bible calls people, fools, who say that there is no Creator God. Clearly an Intelligent Designer caused both the spinning Earth and its revolving moon to orbit the Sun together at close to 70,000 mph (and we have not begun to speak of the amazing reliability and uniformity of the seemingly unfathomable complexities contained within the otherwise hostile Universe in which we live).
Whichever way you look at the atheists’ dilemma, the Bible has them pegged as fools. They are either fools because they do not believe and acknowledge the Lord God Creator of Heaven and Earth (i.e. the Universe), or they are fools because they believe in the impossible: the principles of life and order in the Universe occur by chance through a series of accidental and unpredictable events.
Yet the Bible says that only a fool is wise in his own eyes. Atheists think that they are wiser than the Creator God. Instead of being full of pride, if they were humble, they would act wisely and seek after God. They would do their utmost to call God into account and find out their reason for existence; only atheists see this as the providence of fools, whereas the Bible says that is the what the wise would do. However, atheists prefer to scoff at those who testify that God lives and then warn them that He is going to judge those who refuse to reason with Him about their futile lives; but by seeking out God and securing their own assurance of eternal life while they have the opportunity, they would avoid an unfavorable eternal judgment.
Yet if an atheist went on a plane trip across the Pacific from, say, Chile to China, and if he or she were not warned that there would be insufficient fuel to fly across the ocean if the plane encounters head winds, and it does, and the plane mysteriously disappears somewhere in the ocean, there would be uproar. The families of the deceased passengers would want justice. Therefore, the Bible warns all atheists that after death comes judgment.
The Ten Commandments were given 3500 years ago. God Himself wrote them. In fact, the only words ever attested to have been written by God’s own finger. If we do not live up to them, and these are the standard to what we are going to be held account, we would expect a wise person would get to know what he or she is up against before death. And if one could not meet the requirements, at least, one could seek to discover an alternative option before time is up.
One option is you could seek Jesus Christ out, before you die. I did. I now have the personal assurance that Jesus rose from the dead, and I did not get that assurance reading the Bible. I obtained this assurance from seeking the resurrected Lord of Life who paid the price to redeem us from the futility of being born to suffer and then die, even though we have the capacity to conceptualize the possibility of eternal life. My inability to meet the required standard that would make me eligible for eternal life is no longer an issue for me and I have a personal guarantee in the form of an abiding assurance that this is so. It just so happens, the Bible instructs us to obtain this abiding assurance before we die and not to rely upon doctrines or philosophies of men, which equates to church dogma that masquerades as truth.
Hence, the Bible contrasts a fool with a wise person. A fool is someone who thinks there is no God or says that God does not exist—as an atheist thinks and says—but a wise person seeks the Creator God out. Nothing appears to have changed in this respect since the Psalms were written, except from the New Testament we learn a fool is someone like myself who has sought Lord Jesus Christ and found Him. The New Testament states that I am a fool for Christ’s sake. And all the atheists agree!!

Wednesday, October 18, 2017

IF ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY WERE THE SAME RELIGION THIS WOULD BE A MASSIVE SHOCK TO MOST PEOPLE. Beheadings Are Not Part Of Being A Christian Who Is Following In The Footsteps Of Jesus Christ, Whereas There Is Nothing Wrong With Murdering People When It Comes To Following In The Footsteps of Muhammad. Really the ideas that Islam could ever be considered to be on a par with Christianity is bizarre.

Your history professor says that Islam and Christianity are similar enough to be variants of the same religion. Your history professor screams out why I have a very poor view of historians and why I am an independent thinker—not a doctrinaire or a product of indoctrination.

People who think for themselves seek to find absolutes. Death is an absolute. Not possessing knowledge prior to being born is a given as far as I am concerned—especially in my own case. Suffering is an absolute, because everybody I have met has suffered; not to mention the many people who have written about suffering and the many videos and pictures I have seen of people suffering.

Three absolutes testify to what this life is about.
  1. Non-existence before birth.
  2. Suffering in this world from the time people are born until the time they die.
  3. Death, the cessation of existence as a biological being.
Religion—that is, true religion—is the quest for the truth concerning the ideal life.
Life that is temporal is not really life, because life should be eternal—life is not death.
Logically, the truth is the way that enables us to obtain eternal life.

Christianity is based upon the resurrection of Lord Jesus Christ. Before, He died, the Lord of Life in human form disseminated some of His wisdom. Jesus said that this life on Earth is of no eternal value since it is governed by death. However, if we love one another, even our enemies, we will be able to enter eternal life. Eternal life is guaranteed to those who walk in the way of Jesus, seek to do the will of the Father, and lay their lives down so that people might glorify God, because of their actions.

True followers of Lord Jesus Christ recognize that being born to die and having to suffer is an unjust and futile existence, therefore they seek the truth about life. This conforms to the true definition of religion. False definitions incorporate violations of The Only Words Written By The Finger Of God.

Islam is based on the teachings of Muhammad. Just because Muhammad claimed that Lord Jesus Christ was the Messiah, this does not make it an offshoot of true Christianity.
  • They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah, and [also] the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to worship one God; there is no deity except Him. Exalted is He above whatever they associate with Him. (Surah At-Tawbah [9:31])
More to the point, that the Quran states Jesus is the Messiah—Savior of mankind—this is not what is taught in the mosques. What is taught in the mosques is death to all non-Muslims. This is not just rhetoric but is being carried out today. Whereas, the central tenet of true Christianity is to love your enemies as well as your neighbor. This is not the false teachings of established denominations mistaken for true Christianity—Calvin, for instance, was responsible for the murder of a number of people.
In 5 years as magistrate of the Geneva “church-city-state,” Calvin oversaw 58 death sentences and the exile of 76 people. He wasn't the sole decision-maker in those cases, but personal correspondence and city council records betray his extraordinary influence. When Jacques Gruet, a theologian with differing views, placed a letter in Calvin’s pulpit calling him a hypocrite, he was arrested, tortured for a month and beheaded on July 26, 1547. Gruet's own theological book was later found and burned along with his house while his wife was thrown out into the street to watch.—John Calvin Killed Rival Theologians: Bad Bible Interpretation Justified It
One of the identifying marks of those who belong to the Devil (Satan) is the fact that they condone murder.
  • You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies. (John 8:44)
Muhammad was a murderer.
There were three Jewish tribes living in and around Yathrib, the Banu Qainuqa’, the Ban Nadir and the Banu Quraiza. Once Muhammad realized that they are not going to accept him as their new prophet, he turned against them. —Muhammad a Mass Murderer
Sam Shamoun analyses Muslim dawagandist Jalal Abualrub defense of Muhammad’s bewitchment and control by Satan, which is something that Lord Jesus Christ never succumbed. For we read in the book of Matthew:
Then Jesus was led up by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. And he fasted forty days and forty nights, and afterward he was hungry. And the tempter came and said to him, “If you are the Son of God, command these stones to become loaves of bread.” But he answered, “It is written,‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.’”
    Then the devil took him to the holy city, and set him on the pinnacle of the temple, and said to him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down; for it is written, ‘He will give his angels charge of you,’ and ‘On their hands they will bear you up, lest you strike your foot against a stone.’”
    Jesus said to him, “Again it is written, ‘You shall not tempt the Lord your God.’” Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them; and he said to him, “All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me.” Then Jesus said to him, “Begone, Satan! for it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God
and him only shall you serve.’”
    Then the devil left him, and behold, angels came and ministered to him. (Matthew 4:1–11)
Muhammad and Black Magic
Muslim dawagandist Jalal Abualrub produced a pdf file (*) for his debate with David Wood in order to defend his prophet from the charges leveled by Wood and others (including myself). 
In this rebuttal we will address Jalal’s defense of his prophet’s bewitchment and control by Satan. 
Jalal writes concerning Muhammad falling under the control of black magic:
11) David Wood wrote: ‘Muhammad fell victim to black magic.’
  1. There is no black or green magic. The same hadith quoted here states Prophet Muhammad was cured from the effect of magic: Madinah’s Jews did magic against Muhammad (Bukhari and Muslim), who suffered in the same way Prophet Moses suffered when, {Their ropes and their sticks, by their magic, appeared to him [Musa (Moses)] as though they moved fast} (20:66).
  2. The Quran and Sunna used the same words, ‘Yukhayyalu Ilaihi’, to describe both cases, Muhammad’s and Moses’, where one would think he did or saw something which he did not do or see. Absolutely no Ayah orHadeeth said the Prophet was saying the Quran under the influence of magic or that his religion was affected, or that he started being delirious. These are all false accusations.
  3. Whatever Mr. Wood may say about Muhammad also applies to Moses, unless he likes the Hadeeth only and dismisses the Ayah. (Is Muhammad a Prophet?, p. 10) —Reexamining Satan’s Influence and Control over Muhammad
Talk about being desperate! In the first place, Jalal is splitting hairs here, since whether one wants to call it black magic or simply magic, the point still stands that Muhammad was affected by it. 
Furthermore, the reason why Wood and others call this "black" magic is to denote the fact that this kind of magic (in fact all of it) is evil since God doesn’t approve of it. 
Moreover, Wood didn’t invent this term to describe what happened to Muhammad. Jalal can blame his fellow Muslims for translating the Arabic as black magic: 
And from the evil of the envier when he envieth) this refers to Labid Ibn al-A'sam, the Jew, who was envious of the Prophet (pbuh) and used BLACK MAGIC to separate him from 'A'ishah'. (Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs, Q. 113:5; source; bold and capital emphasis ours) 
(Of the jinn and of mankind) He says: Satan whispers in the hearts of the jinn just as he whispers in the hearts of mankind. The last two surahs were revealed about Labid Ibn al-A'sam, the Jew, who used black magic on the Prophet (pbuh) and when the Prophet (pbuh) read these two surahs on Labid's BLACK MAGIC, Allah relieved him from it and it was as if he was untied from his fetters'. (Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs, Q. 114:6; source: bold and capital emphasis ours) 
Thus, Jalal must contend with the fact that Muhammad came under the control of a Jewish magician. 
This leads us to the problem with Muhammad being affected by sorcery. The Holy Bible says that God’s true servants (including his emissaries) cannot come under the control of Satan such as sorcery or black magic since Yahweh protects them: 
"There is no sorcery against Jacob, no divination against Israel. It will now be said of Jacob and of Israel, ‘See what God has done!’" Numbers 23:23
"The seventy-two returned with joy and said, ‘Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name.’ He replied, ‘I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. I have given you authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm you. However, do not rejoice that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.’" Luke 10:17-20 
This in itself sufficiently proves that Muhammad wasn’t a prophet of the true God and exposes the lie of the Quran that Moses was affected by the magic of the Egyptian sorcerers.
The problem with history and what we see today is that there are different views based upon people’s opinions. Truth has a habit of being consistent and not wavering. The truth is clear. Islam is not Christianity. Neither are all organizations that claim to be Christian teaching the truth about following Jesus, just because they interpret what the Bible means.

Muhammad interprets the Bible also. From what is written in the Bible, and he is an antichrist, as he denies the Son as having been raised from the dead (1 John 2:23).

The Bible states that if people do not speak according to the Law and the Testimony (Isaiah 8:20), it is because they have not light in them.

The Ten Commandments Need To Be Understood If You Are To Know The Truth

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

TRAGIC SHOOTING NOT THE RESULT OF LONE GUN MAN. The Plot To Create Panic And Reasons To Kill The Rights Of Americans To Defend Themselves Against Tyranny Is Very Much Alive. The reality evidenced in countries that have taken guns of citizens as they outlaw guns is only outlaws have guns.

There is a story that a sting was taking place and Stephen Paddock believed he was just setting up another gun deal, but instead became the patsy for a massacre; because a dead dog doesn't bark.A brief look at some facts reported about what happened at Mandalay Bay Hotel, a 43 floor hotel in Las Vegas overlooking a venue where there were some 22,000 people at a concert.

The crew at the concert turned on additional lights to light up the crowd when the shooting started, as seen in this clip, or to see who was doing the shooting.


Rocky Palermo was shot by a gunman in the crowd and says that there were a number of shooters involved.

Conclusion from eyewitness reports is that there were possibly three shooterslocated at the Mandalay Bay Hotel, with a clip showing three shooters in the lower levels, not to mention the many reports of other shooters in up to nine different locations.

We are told that the shooter was Stephen Paddock, a law-abiding accountant and high-roller gambler, who had forwarded over $100,000 to his girlfriend in the Philippines a few days earlier.

The Mandalay Bay Hotel has surveillance cameras, checks for suspicious looking luggage, checks rooms daily, has tight security, yet  the nominated shooter Stephen Pollack was able to take up to the 32nd floor, without being noticed, over twenty semi-automatic and automatic assault guns with ammunition that the anti-gun lobby want banned. 

More than this, Stephen Paddock supposedly set up three cameras himself to surveil the corridor outside his room and also what he was doing in his room.

The FBI has confiscated all the video showing Stephen Paddock, or anyone else involved in the shooting, and refuse to release it.

Craig Sawyer in an interview on the Alex Jones channel said that the fact the video has not been released is indicative of there being more than one actor and that this is a controlled cover-up with a false narrative designed to deceive, divide and disarm Americans.

Receipts have been produced showing that Stephen Paddock was in the Hotel earlier in the weekcontrary to what the FBI are saying; with journalist Laura Loomer saying that she was told that Paddock checked in on the 25th of September.

Whether Stephen Paddock was the actual dead patsy is uncertain, as the evidence suggests someone else could have been killed in his steadin fact the conflicting evidence points to the cover up of a muck up.

The photo purported to be the dead Stephen Paddock is questioned because there is no number 13 tattooed on the dead person's neck.

Furthermore, a close look at the ears reveals the dead person on the carpet has a curl in his ear lobe that is not evident on Stephen Paddock, and the dead man appears to have eyebrows, whereas Paddock has none.

Inline image 1


A distinguishable feature about the Paddock brothers is not only their ears, but also the fact that they have very light eyebrows.

The person lying on the floor in the photo at Got News clearly has no eyebrows and, even though he has different ears, looks like Stephen Paddock without his tattoo.  

The left ear of the dead man seems curled and hanging at the lobe, (like Obama's ear hangs) whereas Paddock's ears do not hang, as evidenced on the left ear of the brother (in this video) and here in this shot

However, the photos of Paddock at the protest could have been his brother, as they look similar and the hat makes identification more difficult.

But a magnified closeup reveals that the man in the pink has a different ear and dark eyebrows.

A Stephen Paddock worked for NASA and we are told that he had also worked for Lockheed Martin, possibly in the advanced research department. 


According to one narrative, he was opposed to President Donald Trump and was CIA.

Paddock appears to have the modus operandi of a FBI/CIA agent dealing in illegal gun-running (or drug-running), as he apparently owned 2 planes and gambled to launder money.

Yoichi Shimatsu says that Stephen Paddock was an assassin for the shadow government, with his brother Eric Paddock claiming that the killer was flying his plane every week.

Robert Steele claims that the Las Vegas massacre was a staged drill that was hi-jacked by interests keen to create panic and weaken the gun lobby; moreover, insiders with prior knowledge of event sold $297m in shares prior to Las Vegas massacre. 


And just like Peter Sutherland as well as the CEO of BP, Jim Murren, and their affiliated organizations dumped their stock in the weeks leading up the Mandalay Bay Massacre.Dave Hodges Common Sense Show



Apparently there is the possibility of large gamblers actually being able to make a living from video pokerwhich sounds like a very long shot unless favored by the operator of the machine.

The Dubai owners of the Mandalay Bay Hotel are Islamic and support the Democrats, with Murren actively supporting anti-American causes.

According to Laura Loomer, her contacts from the Mandalay Bay Hotel have told her that employees were given 10 weeks paid leave to support Hillary Clinton.


There is a query as to whether those who desire to ban guns and repeal the 2nd amendment of the constitution are behind these shootings, but maybe there are other motives, as they certainly look well planned with cooperation at high levels of government in a demoncratic haunt known as Sin City.

Paul Ryan has his name on the trigger to ban guns  and thinks it a good idea to start with bump stock devices as seen on the guns photographed in the hotel room of the shooter.

High on the agenda appears to be repeal of the 2nd amendment so Americans cannot arm themselves against such things as what happened in Catalonia.

Fox News demonstrates that it is fostering the narrative that Trump is an evil man when Psychiatrist Michael Welner is being interviewed. The interviewer brings attention to Donald Trump, who is shown getting off a plane, as the psychiatrist talks about a person who is detached commits mass killings.

Then I saw the wicked buried; they used to go in and out of the holy place, and were praised in the city where they had done such things. This also is vanity. (Ecclesiastes 8:10)

A wicked man accepts a bribe from the bosom to pervert the ways of justice.(Proverbs 17:23)


Laura Loomer uncovers Mandalay offering to match employees funding certain terrorist organizations

Eric Paddock has given interviews and through his body language has indicated that he knows more than he is saying, but then maybe a Freudian Slip, when he said:  “This is like someone else did this.”


Soros funded fake fact checker snopes.com claims that there was only one shooter while politician Trey Gowdy questions the single person narrative; after all, it is so conspicuously lame.
The cabbie video not only identifies guns in different places, but when picking up passengers, also provides evidence of the concert attendee's fear that the shooting was meant to induce.

This could have been a CIA attempt to bring down alternative media and label citizen journalists as fake news because the alt-news would recognize the inconsistencies in the official narrative and call the event a false flag.

By using actors and killing real people as well, the aim of the CIA could have been for the alternative media to point out the actors faking they were dead, and then by revealing the names and families of those who were actually killed or wounded, this could have been used to discredit the reporting of fake deaths as fake news, and place pressure on government sources to shut down the real news that contradict the propaganda narratives of the mainstream media (MSM).

massive coverup is taking place with the FBI confiscating phones and wiping recordings, but too many people have filmed different incidents of shootings and the cover up of this muck up is being ripped apart.


Eventually, US citizens will be asked (if not mandated by law) to hand over their guns for cashif the globalists get their way.

The  time of Jacobs Trouble is coming,  so maybe Stephen Paddock was code for "a step towards the FEMA enclosure"with the whole narrative being a construct for a psychological operation.


LIKE IT SHARE IT BEFORE THIS PAGE IS BANNED