CAN A WOMAN FILL A MAN'S SHOES AT THE TOP? Are Boots Made For Walking? Why Not Wear Flip Flops? The Top Ten Flip Flops That The President Of America Would Have To Wear If It Is A Woman.

Actually there are 20 Flip Flops that Hillary will have to wear, but as she has a habit of doing, she will kick them off as if they were of no consequence, put on her boots and start walking all over you.

The Associated Press Headline: "Trade Deal, Keystone Open Clinton To Flip-Flop Charges" (Ken Thomas and Lisa Lerer, "Trade Deal, Keystone Open Clinton To Flip-Flop Charges," The Associated Press, 10/8/15)

FREE TRADE FLIP FLOPS

#1 Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)

FLIP: As Secretary Of State, Clinton Took "A Leading Part In Drafting The Trans-Pacific Partnership." "She's pressed the case for U.S. business in Cambodia, Singapore, Vietnam, Indonesia, and other countries in China's shadow. She's also taken a leading part in drafting the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a free trade pact that would give U.S. companies a leg up on their Chinese competitors." (Elizabeth Dwoskin and Indira Laksmanan, "How Hillary Clinton Created A U.S. Business-Promotion Machine," Bloomberg, 1/10/13)

• Clinton Had Said The Trans-Pacific Partnership "Sets The Gold Standard In Trade Agreements." "[We] need to keep upping our game both bilaterally and with partners across the region through agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership or TPP. Australia is a critical partner. This TPP sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade, the kind of environment that has the rule of law and a level playing field. And when negotiated, this agreement will cover 40 percent of the world's total trade and build in strong protections for workers and the environment." (Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton, Remarks at Techport Australia , 11/15/12)

FLOP: Earlier This Month, Clinton Publicly Announced Her Opposition To The TPP. "After months of delicately avoiding expressing an opinion on the controversial trade deal, Mrs. Clinton said the agreement in its current form did not meet her high bar for protecting American workers, the environment and advancing national security… But while Mrs. Clinton's opposition to the trade pact could do much to appease Democratic voters and labor unions that have seized on the deal as a symbol for the perils of globalization, her decision to repudiate a major legislative goal of Mr. Obama's - one she initially supported - carries significant political risks." (Amy Chozick, "Hillary Clinton Opposes Obama's Trade-Pacific Trade Deal," The New York Times , 10/7/15)

#2 U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS)

FLIP: In 2012, Clinton Called The U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement A "Historic Milestone That Will Lead To Even More Trade And Investment Between Our Two Countries." CLINTON: "Today, the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) enters into force, marking an historic milestone that will lead to even more trade and investment between our two countries. KORUS will provide new market access opportunities in Korea's dynamic trillion dollar economy for U.S. exporters, creating jobs here at home while increasing opportunities for Korean companies in the United States. This agreement is another example of this Administration's commitment to deepening our economic engagement throughout the world." ( Press Release, "U.S., Korea Free Trade Agreement Takes Effect," U.S. State Department, 3/15/12)

FLOP: Earlier This Month, Clinton Announced That She Opposed The U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement. CLINTON: "I think that there are still a lot of unanswered questions, but for me, it really comes down to those three points that I made, and the fact that we've learned a lot about trade agreements in the past years. Sometimes they look great on paper. I know when President Obama came into office, he inherited a trade agreement with South Korea. I, along with other members of the Cabinet, pushed hard to get a better agreement. We think we made improvements. Now looking back on it, it doesn't have the results we thought it would have in terms of access to the market, more exports, et cetera." (PBS's "News Hour," 10/7/15)

#3 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)

FLIP: In 2006, Clinton Said That She "Thinks NAFTA Has Been A Boon To The Economy." "CLINTON: Clinton thinks NAFTA has been a boon to the economy, but voted against the Central American-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement, saying it would drive jobs offshore." (Michael Rothfeld, "Newsday's Guide To Politics And Politicians," [New York] Newsday, 9/11/06)

FLOP: In August 2007, Clinton Said "NAFTA And The Way It's Been Implemented Has Hurt A Lot Of American Workers." QUESTION: "Let's move on to another important topic for this audience in particular, the subject of trade. Senator Edwards had touched on this, Senator Clinton. Over the weekend, this past weekend, you expressed some disappointment that NAFTA, in your words, did not realize the benefits that it was promised - it promised, rather. How would you fix it?" CLINTON: "Well, I had said that for many years, that, you know, NAFTA and the way it's been implemented has hurt a lot of American workers. In fact, I did a study in New York looking at the impact of NAFTA on business people, workers and farmers who couldn't get their products into Canada despite NAFTA. So, clearly we have to have a broad reform in how we approach trade. NAFTA's a piece of it, but it's not the only piece of it." (Sen. Hillary Clinton, AFL-CIO Presidential Candidates Forum, Chicago, IL, 8/7/07)

• After Promoting Her Husband's Trade Agenda For Years And Lobbying For The Passage Of NAFTA, Clinton Moved Away From Her Husband's Policies During Her 2008 Campaign. "Clinton promoted her husband's trade agenda for years, and friends say that she is a free-trader at heart. 'The simple fact is, nations with free-market systems do better,' she said in a 1997 speech. Now, she is moving away from her husband's policies by opposing a trade deal with South Korea and raising questions about NAFTA. 'We just can't keep doing what we did in the 20th Century,' Clinton said in a March interview." (Kim Chipman and Nicholas Johnston, "Edwards's Stance On Trade May Attract Union Support," Bloomberg, 8/7/07)

#4 Colombia Free Trade Agreement

FLIP: In 2008, Clinton Opposed A Free Trade Agreement With Colombia, Pledging To Defeat It And Claiming She'd Do "Everything I Can" To Reject It."Speaking about the Colombia trade deal at a Washington meeting of the Communications Workers of America union, Clinton proclaimed: 'As I have said for months, I oppose the deal. I have spoken out against the deal, I will vote against the deal, and I will do everything I can to urge the Congress to reject the Colombia Free Trade Agreement.'" ("Clinton Reiterates Opposition To Colombia Trade Pact," Los Angeles Times, 4/9/08)

FLOP: As Secretary Of State, Clinton Said "We Are Absolutely Committed To Passing The U.S.-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement." CLINTON: "And of course, we are absolutely committed to passing the U.S.-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement to open new markets and create jobs and opportunities for both of our peoples." (Hillary Clinton, Remarks With Colombian Foreign Minister Maria Angela Holguin, Washington, DC, 5/31/11)

#5 Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR)

FLIP: Clinton, On The Day CAFTA First Passed The Senate In 2005: "This Is A Sad Day For Supporters Of Free And Fair Rules-Based Trade." CLINTON: "This is a sad day for supporters of free and fair rules-based trade. Our relationship with our Central American neighbors is a critical one. The right CAFTA deal would strengthen ties between the U.S. and these nations. I urge the Administration to reopen the CAFTA negotiations and re-establish the broad, bipartisan coalition for trade."(Hillary Clinton, Congressional Record, 6/30/05, S. 7731)

FLOP: As Secretary Of State, Clinton Touted Her Efforts Relating To CAFTA And Said "We've Worked To Promote Growth And Create Jobs Through … Multilateral Pacts Like NAFTA And CAFTA-DR." CLINTON: "In our region, prosperity has widened in recent decades. We've worked to promote growth and create jobs through sound fiscal policy, bilateral trade agreements, multilateral pacts like NAFTA and CAFTA-DR, and institutions like the Inter-American Development Bank." (Secretary Hillary Clinton, Remarks At Pathways To Prosperity Ministerial, San Jose, Costa Rica, 3/4/10)

TAXES AND SPENDING FLIP FLOPS

#6 Raising The U.S. Debt Limit

FLIP: In March 2006, Clinton Called A Vote To Increase The Debt Limit "A Failure Of Fiscal Discipline … A Failure Of Foresight, Vision And Above All A Failure Of Leadership." CLINTON: "Today's vote to increase the federal debt limit to nearly $9 trillion represents a profound failure of this Administration's and Republican Congress' policies. It is not only a failure of fiscal discipline. It is a failure of foresight, vision and above all a failure of leadership." (Press Release, "Sen. Clinton Issues Statement On Senate Vote To Increase Federal Debt Limit," Sen. Hillary Clinton, 3/16/06)

• As A Senator Clinton Voted Against Raising The Debt Limit Three Times. (S.2578, Roll Call Vote #148 : Passed 68-29: R 31-15; D 36-14; I 1-0, 7/11/02, Clinton Voted Nay; S.2578,Roll Call Vote #148 : Passed 68-29: R 31-15; D 36-14; I 1-0, 7/11/02, Clinton Voted Nay; H.J.Res.47, Roll Call Vote #54 : Passed 52-48: R 51-3; D 1-44; I 0-1, 3/16/06, Clinton Voted Nay)

FLOP: In 2014, Clinton Described Increasing The Debt Ceiling As "Common Sense" And Suggested She Was "Praying" Congress Would Vote To Raise It .CLINTON: "If you remember July 2011, some in Congress were talking about defaulting on our debts. And remember these are debts Congress had already voted for and appropriated money for. It wasn't about anything in the future. It was all about will you be good for what you've already spent and borrowed. I was at this kind of Chamber of Commerce type event in Hong Kong and I was meeting with all of these Asian business leaders. None of them could understand. They were lining up to say to me, 'what is going on? Is America really willing to risk its credit? Could America still be counted on as the global leader?' I reassured them as best I could, and I said 'oh don't worry about. We do these things from time to time but we will come to our senses and get it worked out.' Then of course I was praying that common sense would make a comeback." (Hillary Clinton, Remarks In Broomfield, CO, 6/2/14)

#7 Raising Payroll Taxes

FLIP: In 2008, Clinton Had "Flatly Rejected" An Increase To The Taxable Payroll Limit, Disagreeing With A Plan Candidate Obama Had Put Forward To Raise The Taxable Limit. "At a town hall here Tuesday, she said she'd be open to a Social Security tax increase proposed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), her radical rival in the primary. During the 2008 campaign, Clinton had flatly rejected such an increase. Her comments this week could suggest that she has warmed to the idea, or that she is responding to a broader shift to the left among Democrats." (Max Ehrenfreund and Anne Gearan, "Clinton Is Open To Raising Social Security Taxes On Six-Figure Earners," The Washington Post , 8/12/15)

FLOP: At A Recent Town Hall, Clinton Called The Current Limits "Unfair" Before Then "Suggesting An Increase In The Limit." "Clinton was responding to a question from the audience at a community college about the fact that the wealthy and upper middle class don't pay Social Security taxes on anything they earn above a certain amount. That limit is $118,500 this year. 'I can understand why you'd think that was unfair,' the former U.S. senator and secretary of state said, before suggesting an increase in the limit." (Max Ehrenfreund and Anne Gearan, "Clinton Is Open To Raising Social Security Taxes On Six-Figure Earners," The Washington Post , 8/12/15)

FOREIGN POLICY FLIP FLOPS

#8 Arming Syrian Rebels

FLIP: As Secretary Of State, "Clinton Publicly Expressed Doubt With Arming The Rebels." "As secretary of state, though, Clinton publicly expressed doubt with arming the rebels. 'What are we going to arm them with and against what,' Clinton told CBS in February 2012. 'You are not going to bring tanks over the borders of Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan - that's not going to happen. So maybe at the best you can smuggle in, you know, automatic weapons.'" (Dan Merica, "Clinton Dances Between Loyalty And Self-Interest," CNN, 8/13/14)

• As Secretary, Clinton Expressed A Concern That Arming The Syrian Rebels Could Lead To Weapons Going To Al Qaeda. "Another administration concern is that weapons might go to al Qaeda. 'We know al Qaeda [leader Ayman al-] Zawahiri is supporting the opposition in Syria. Are we supporting al Qaeda in Syria? Hamas is now supporting the opposition. Are we supporting Hamas in Syria?' Clinton said. 'If you're a military planner or if you're a secretary of state and you're trying to figure out do you have the elements of an opposition that is actually viable, that we don't see. We see immense human suffering that is heartbreaking.'" " (Wyatt Andrews, "Clinton: Arming Syrian Rebels Could Help Al Qaeda," CBS News, 2/27/12)

FLOP: Clinton Now Advocates For Arming The Syrian Rebels. "Hillary Rodham Clinton put some distance between herself and the Obama administration's handling of the fight against Islamic State militants, saying she had pushed, unsuccessfully, to do more early on to help Syrian moderate forces in the fight against President Bashar Assad. 'I believed that they would be more likely to work with the United States and the West if we supported them early,' Clinton said in the morning email newsletter theSkimm." (Michael A. Memoli, "Clinton Distances Herself From Obama On Islamic State," Los Angeles Times, 7/30/15)

#9 Syria's Bashar Al Assad's "Reformer" Credentials

FLIP: In 2011, Clinton Said Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad Was "A Reformer."CLINTON: "There's a different leader in Syria now. Many of the members of Congress of both parties who have gone to Syria in recent months have said they believe he's a reformer." (CBS's "Face The Nation," 3/27/11)

FLOP: Last Month, Clinton Claimed That As Secretary, She Viewed Assad As The "Principal Threat In The Syrian Conflict Because Of His "Ruthless Behavior Toward His Own People." CLINTON "You know, Al, I had a different strategy back when I was secretary of state. I can't sit here today and tell you that if my strategy had been followed we'd be in a different place because this has so much of a dynamic of its own. What I believed then is that Assad was the principle threat because his bombarding and his ruthless behavior toward his own people was going to create more terrorists, it was going to create refugees, it was going to destabilize neighboring countries. All that has come to pass." (MSNBC Live, Hillary Clinton Interview With Al Sharpton, 9/30/15)

#10 U.S. Embargo On Cuba

FLIP: While Campaigning For Senate Seat In 2000, Clinton Said "She Would Oppose Lifting The Embargo Against Cuba Until Democracy Took Root There.""In her speech, Mrs. Clinton discussed several specific issues that she would likely deal with as senator. She said she would oppose lifting the embargo against Cuba until democracy took root there." (Dean E. Murphy, "Mrs. Clinton Suggests That U.S. Engage Aggressively In World Affairs," The New York Times , 10/18/00)

FLOP: In July 2015, Clinton Called For A Lift Of The U.S. Embargo Against Cuba."Saying 'America's approach to Cuba is at a crossroads,' Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton called for an end to the 53-year-old Cuban trade embargo in Miami on Friday. The former secretary of state's chosen location of Florida International University was significant for two reasons: Clinton delivered the message in the heart of the Cuban exile community, which is divided over the issue, and did it at a college campus, where the crowd tilted younger and, according to polls, more likely to support lifting the controversial measure." (Michael Vasquez and Jenny Luna, "Hillary Clinton In Miami: Lift The Embargo Against Cuba," Miami Herald, 7/31/15)

• PolitiFact: "Clinton Has Made A Full Change Of Position" On Cuba, So We Rate It A Full Flop." "In her 2000 campaign for Senate, Clinton clearly stated that she wasn't ready to lift the Cuba embargo. During her first bid for president in 2007, she repeatedly called for reforms in Cuba before any such changes to the embargo. But by 2014, she was a critic of the embargo and said it hadn't achieved it's goals. In a speech in Miami on July 31, Clinton forcefully stated that she believes it is time to drop the embargo. Clinton has made a full change of position, so we rate it a Full Flop." (Amy Sherman, "Did Hilary Clinton Change Position On The Cuba Embargo?" PolitiFact, 8/3/15)

#11 Iran's Right To Enrich Uranium

FLIP: Clinton Said In 2010 That Iran Could Enrich Uranium For Civilian Purposes."Mrs Clinton also told the BBC that Iran can enrich uranium for civilian purposes in the future, a rare statement for an American official. Washington has always been vague when asked whether Iran should one day be allowed to enrich its own uranium for civilian energy. But Mrs Clinton told the BBC that Iran can enrich uranium for civilian purposes at some future date once it has demonstrated it can do so in a responsible manner and in accordance with Iran's international obligations." (Kim Ghattas, "Clinton Urges Iran To Fully Engage In Nuclear Talks," BBC, 12/3/10)

FLOP: Clinton, August 2014: "I've Always Been In The Camp That Held That [Iran] Did Not Have A Right To Enrichment." GOLDBERG: "It seems that you've shifted your position on Iran's nuclear ambitions. By [chief U.S. negotiator] Wendy Sherman's definition of maximalism, you've taken a fairly maximalist position-little or no enrichment for Iran. Are you taking a harder line than your former colleagues in the Obama administration are taking on this matter?" CLINTON: It's a consistent line. I've always been in the camp that held that they did not have a right to enrichment. Contrary to their claim, there is no such thing as a right to enrich. This is absolutely unfounded. There is no such right. I am well aware that I am not at the negotiating table anymore, but I think it's important to send a signal to everybody who is there that there cannot be a deal unless there is a clear set of restrictions on Iran. The preference would be no enrichment. The potential fallback position would be such little enrichment that they could not break out. So, little or no enrichment has always been my position." (Jeffrey Goldberg, "Hillary Clinton: 'Failure' To Help Syrian Rebels Led To The Rise Of ISIS," The Atlantic , 8/10/14)

• Under The Nuclear Agreement, Iran Will Be Permitted To Enrich Uranium And Maintain A 3.67 Percent Uranium Level At Its Natanz Facility. "The deal reduces the number of Iranian centrifuges by two-thirds. It places bans on enrichment at key facilities, and limits uranium research and development to the Natanz facility. The deal caps uranium enrichment at 3.67 percent and limits the stockpile to 300 kg, all for 15 years." (Jethro Mullen And Nic Robertson, "Landmark Deal Reached On Iran Nuclear Program," CNN, 7/14/15)

ENERGY FLIP FLOPS

#12 Keystone XL Pipeline

FLIP: Clinton Once Favored Construction Of The Keystone XL Pipeline. "As secretary of state, Clinton was seen as initially favoring construction of the pipeline. '[W]e are inclined to do so,' Clinton said during a 2010 speaking engagement when asked about approving new tar sands pipelines. 'We're either going to be dependent on dirty oil from the Gulf or dirty oil from Canada." (Alex Seitz-Wald, "Hillary Clinton (Finally) Comes Out Against Keystone Pipeline," MSNBC, 9/22/15)

• In October 2010, Clinton Said She Was "Inclined" To Approve The Keystone XL Pipeline Because "We're Either Going To Be Dependent On Dirty Oil From The Gulf Or Dirty Oil From Canada." QUESTION: "Another international issue that you signed in on last year was the Alberta Clipper, a pipeline from Alberta that brings tar sands, oil sands directly into Wisconsin to the U.S. Midwest. This is some of the dirtiest fuel in the world. And how can the U.S. be saying climate change is a priority when we're mainlining some of the dirtiest fuel that exists." CLINTON: "Well, there hasn't been a final decision made. It is…" QUESTION: "Are you willing to reconsider it?" CLINTON: "Probably not. (Laughter.) And we -- but we haven't finish all of the analysis. So as I say, we've not yet signed off on it. But we are inclined to do so and we are for several reasons -- going back to one of your original questions -- we're either going to be dependent on dirty oil from the Gulf or dirty oil from Canada. And until we can get our act together as a country and figure out that clean, renewable energy is in both our economic interests and the interests of our planet. I mean, I don't think it will come as a surprise to anyone how deeply disappointed the President and I are about our inability to get the kind of legislation through the Senate that the United States was seeking." (Hillary Clinton, Remarks On Innovation And American Leadership To The Commonwealth Club Of California , San Francisco, CA, 10/15/10)

FLOP: Last Month, Clinton Announced That She Opposed Construction Of The Keystone XL Pipeline. "Hillary Clinton moved from being 'inclined' to support the controversial Keystone XL pipeline to announcing Tuesday that she'd oppose it. The move that comes as the former secretary of state seeks the Democratic presidential nomination and felt pressure from rival candidates as well as environmentalists and progressives." (Theodore Schleifer, "Hillary Clinton's 5 Takes On The Keystone Pipeline," CNN, 9/22/15)

• Clinton: "Therefore I Oppose It And I Oppose It Because I Don't Think, I Don't Think It's In The Best Interests Of What We Need To Do Combat Climate Change." (Hillary Clinton, Remarks At A Community Forum In Des Moines, IA, 9/22/15)

#13 Ethanol Mandate

FLIP: "Clinton Opposed The Ethanol Mandate In The Senate In 2002 And Called It A 'Tax.'" (Timothy Cama, "Clinton Meets With Ethanol Representatives," The Hill, 4/15/15)

FLOP: In 2008, Clinton Announced That She Was "Strongly Supportive" Of An Ethanol Mandate. "But when she ran in the 2008 presidential election, Clinton was strongly supportive of the renewable standard, which is widely supported in Iowa, whose economy depends large on the corn that makes most ethanol. She said ethanol provides one of the best chances toward 'limiting our dependence on foreign oil.'" (Timothy Cama, "Clinton Meets With Ethanol Representatives," The Hill, 4/15/15)

IMMIGRATION FLIP FLOPS

#14 Deportation Of Illegal Immigrants Working In The United States

FLIP: Clinton In 2003: "I Am, You Know, Adamantly Against Illegal Immigrants.""We've got to do several things and I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants. I made this exception basically on humanitarian grounds because of the individual story but certainly we've got to do more at our borders. And people have to stop employing illegal immigrants. Come up to Westchester, go to Suffolk and Nassau counties, stand in the street corners in Brooklyn or the Bronx - you're going to see loads of people waiting to get picked up to go do yard work and construction work and domestic work." (Hillary Clinton, John Gambling Radio Show , February 2003)

FLOP: Clinton Now Says She "Would Go Further" Than Obama On Illegal Immigration And "Shield Some Illegal Immigrants From Deportation." "In recent weeks, Clinton has called for reforming the nation's criminal justice system to reduce the number of people in prison. The policies she backed tacitly repudiated some of the tough-on-crime moves of her husband's administration which helped boost incarceration rates. She has advocated an immigration policy that would go further than President Obama to shield some illegal immigrants from deportation." (David Lauter, "Clinton Has Shifted Left, But So Have Americans," Los Angeles Times, 5/22/15)

#15 Driver's Licenses For Illegal Immigrants

FLIP: In 2008, Clinton Opposed Driver's Licenses For Illegal Immigrants. "As a presidential candidate in 2008, she opposed gay marriage, equivocated on granting driver's licenses to people who were living in the U.S. illegally and endured heavy criticism from rival Barack Obama over her stance on campaign finance." (Lisa Lerer, "Clinton Patches Relations With Liberals At Campaign's Outset," The Associated Press , 4/19/15)

FLOP: Earlier This Year, Clinton Said She Supports Driver's Licenses For Illegal Immigrants. "Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Thursday spoke out in favor of giving driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants, taking a firm stance on an issue that hurt her during the 2008 election after she seemed intentionally vague on her position…The statement -- simple and straightforward as it is -- is the latest example of Clinton's effort to avoid the pitfalls that doomed her 2008 bid for the Democratic nomination. During that election, she came under fire from her opponents for giving a vague and contradictory answer about her position during a primary debate." (Jose A DelReal, "This Time, Hillary Clinton Supports Giving Driver's Licenses To Undocumented Immigrants," The Washington Post , 4/16/15)

#16 Sanctuary Cities

FLIP: In 2007, Clinton Advocated For Local Law Enforcement To Ignore Federal Agencies Requests. RUSSERT: "But you would allow the sanctuary cities to disobey the federal law?" CLINTON: "Well, I don't think there is any choice. The ICE groups go in and raid individuals, but if you're a local police chief and you're trying to solve a crime that you know people from the immigrant community have information about, they may not talk to you if they think you're also going to be enforcing the immigration laws. Local law enforcement has a different job than federal immigration enforcement. The problem is the federal government has totally abdicated its responsibility." (Hillary Clinton, 2007 Democratic Presidential Candidates Debate at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 9/26/07)

FLOP: In July 2015, Clinton Stated That San Francisco Should Have Listened To The Department Of Homeland Security's Request To Deport This Criminal.CLINTON: "Well, what should be done is any city should listen to the Department of Homeland Security, which as I understand it urged them to deport this man again after he got out of prison another time. Here's a case where we've deported, we've deported, we've deported, he ends back up in our country. And I think the city made a mistake. The city made a mistake not to deport someone that the federal government strongly felt should be deported." (CNN's " The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer," 7/7/15)

GUN CONTROL FLIP FLOPS

#17 New Federal Gun Control

FLIP: During A 2008 Democrat Primary Debate, Clinton Argued That Federal "Blanket Rules" On Guns "Doesn't Make Sense." "Amid a heated moment in the 2008 Democratic primary, in a debate against then-Illinois senator Barack Obama that April, Clinton argued that 'having any kind of blanket rules' set by the federal government on guns 'doesn't make sense.'" (Christopher Massie, "Clinton In 2008: Federal Government Trying To Impose "Blanket Rules" On Guns Doesn't Make Sense," BuzzFeed, 10/3/15)

FLOP: Clinton "Has Made Strict Gun Laws A Centerpiece Of Her Presidential Campaign" And Has Become "One Of The Fiercest Proponents Of Tougher Gun Control." " Clinton, meanwhile, has made strict gun laws a centerpiece of her presidential campaign. On Monday, she will vow to use executive power to expand background checks for sellers at gun shows and online and back legislation banning domestic abusers from purchasing guns. She will also back congressional efforts to stop retailers from selling guns to people with incomplete background checks, as happened when Charleston shooter Dylann Roof bought his gun. Clinton has emerged as one of the fiercest proponents of tougher gun control after a series of shootings over the past several months has reignited debate over gun laws on the presidential campaign" (Lisa Lerer, "Clinton To Push New Gun Controls After Oregon Shooting," The Associated Press, 10/5/15)

• "Clinton Has Been A Strong Proponent Of Gun Control This Election Cycle." "Clinton has been a strong proponent of gun control this election cycle, calling for a 'national movement' to take on the National Rifle Association and universal background checks for gun-buyers. She has alluded to her support for the gun control policies of her husband Bill Clinton's presidential administration, from the federal assault weapons ban to the Brady Bill, which mandated federal background checks on firearm purchases." (Christopher Massie, "That Time Hillary Clinton's Campaign Attacked Obama In 2008 For Flip-Flopping On Guns," BuzzFeed, 10/12/15)

#18 Gun Ownership

FLIP: In 2008, Clinton Said Guns Were A Part Of America's "Culture." " 'You know, my dad took me out behind the cottage that my grandfather built on a little lake called Lake Winola outside of Scranton and taught me how to shoot when I was a little girl," she said. 'You know, some people now continue to teach their children and their grandchildren. It's part of culture. It's part of a way of life. People enjoy hunting and shooting because it's an important part of who they are. Not because they are bitter.'" (Peter Hamby, "Clinton Touts Her Experience With Guns," CNN's Political Ticker, 4/12/08)

• In 2008, Clinton Sent Out A Mailer That "Attacked Obama For First Coming Out In Favor Of A Ban On Handguns" And For Saying That Small Town People "Cling To Guns." "The mailer attacked Obama for first coming out in favor of a ban on handguns while speaking in Chicago, then for telling an Idaho crowd that he supported the Second Amendment, and finally for a comment he made about 'small towns in Pennsylvania' who 'cling to guns or religion.' The campaign sent out the mailer in May, a month after Clinton called Obama's 'cling to guns' remark 'elitist,' saying that guns were 'part of culture,' and telling the story of how her father taught her to shoot in her childhood." (Christopher Massie, "That Time Hillary Clinton's Campaign Attacked Obama In 2008 For Flip-Flopping On Guns," BuzzFeed, 10/12/15)
• " Obama Shot Back, Accusing Her Of 'Talking Like She's Annie Oakley.'" (Christopher Massie, "That Time Hillary Clinton's Campaign Attacked Obama In 2008 For Flip-Flopping On Guns," BuzzFeed, 10/12/15)

FLOP: Clinton Now Says "That Gun Culture In The U.S. Has Become 'Way Out Of Balance,'" And That "We've Got To Rein In What Has Become An Almost Article Of Faith That Anybody Can Have A Gun Anywhere, Anytime." "Potential 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said Tuesday that gun culture in the U.S. has become 'way out of balance.' 'I think that we've got to rein in what has become an almost article of faith that anybody can have a gun anywhere, anytime,' Clinton said at the National Council for Behavioral Health conference in Maryland." (Laura Stampler, "Hillary Clinton Blasts 'Way Out Of Balance' Gun Culture," Time, 5/6/14)

GAY RIGHTS FLIP FLOPS

#19 Gay Marriage

FLIP: In January 2000, Clinton Said Marriage Should Be "Between A Man And A Woman" Because "Marriage Has Got Historic, Religious And Moral Content That Goes Back To The Beginning Of Time." "Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday that she favors full benefits for partners in homosexual relationships, but marriages should be 'between a man and a woman.' 'Marriage has got historic, religious and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman,' Mrs. Clinton said after a news conference on her U.S. Senate campaign trail." (Jim Fitzgerald, "First Lady Opposes Recognition Of Gay Marriage," The Associated Press, 1/20/00)

• In October 2000, Clinton Said "I Don't Support Gay Marriages…" "'I don't support gay marriages, but I do support extending benefits to couples, domestic partner benefits... and the kind of civil union that Vermont adopted seems to be the way to create that opportunity for people,' she told an audience of about 75 people gathered for a campaign event at Onondaga Community College." (Marc Humbert, "Hillary Clinton Says She Supports Vermont-Style Civil Unions," The Associated Press, 10/24/00)

FLOP: Clinton Has Evolved On Same Sex Marriage And Is Thrilled That Same Sex Marriages Are "The Law Of The Land." CLINTON: "On same-sex marriage, like a lot of people, including our President, I did evolve and I was not raised to even imagine this. And I'm thrilled now that it's the law of the land and I have a good friends are who are now able to be married because of the changes we've made legally and constitutionally." (NBC, "Meet The Press", 9/27/15)

• PolitiFact: "On Same Sex Marriage, We Give Clinton A Full Flop." "It's up to voters to decide how they feel about her changed stance, but on same-sex marriage we give Clinton a Full Flop." (Amy Sherman, "Hillary Clinton's Changing Position On Same-Sex Marriage," PolitiFact , 6/17/15)

#20 Defense Of Marriage Act

FLIP: Clinton Said That Had She Been In The Senate In 1996, She Would Have Supported The Defense Of Marriage Act. "The First Lady reluctantly waded into the issue in response to questions, saying she backed her husband's signing of the GOP-sponsored Defense of Marriage Act of 1996, which bans federal recognition of gay marriages and lets states ignore same-sex unions licensed elsewhere. After repeated questioning by reporters, she finally said that had she been in the Senate in 1996, she would have supported the law." (Joe Siegel, "Hil Nixes Same-Sex Marriage," The [New York] Daily News, 1/11/00)

FLOP: In 2007, Clinton Repudiated Her Support For The Defense Of Marriage Act Signed Into Law During Her Husband's Administration. "The news, though, seems to be that Hillary is repudiating her long (if tepidly) held support for the Defense of Marriage Act, which her husband signed, and which drew her criticism in New York." (Ben Smith, "Hillary Repudiates DOMA," Politico, 6/3/07)

TRUMP IS TO BE TOPPLED BY REPUBLICANS WHO HATE THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE. The Globalists Seek To Destroy The People. Republican prostitutes in the legal profession are seeking to screw Donald Trump at the Cleveland Convention.

IMAGE CREDITS: GAGE SKIDMORE / FLICKR.

I hope we have not converted our pro-Trump stop the steal rally to a unity and victory rally in Cleveland July 18th too soon. A motion to unbind all delegates, along with many other underhanded strategies, is being discussed by the elite of the republican legal establishment, with the permission (if under not the instruction) of speaker Paul Ryan. Bitter operatives of Ted Cruz even mailed voters before Virginia county conventions in an attempt to grab delegates.

The extremely capable Paul Manafort beat back that charge for Trump. As someone who saw both Nixon, Reagan up close while in their service I have never seen anything like the whirlwind of Donald J. Trump. He is bigger than the Republican Party. After a wildly successful, if unconventional, primary campaign that closed off any other candidates’ path to 1247 delegates before the convention, Donald Trump is finally being called the presumptive nominee by some, but not the insiders. The battle for his nomination is far from over. The establishment is still plotting to silence the voice of the majority of republican primary voters. To many journalists, the inner workings of party rules are “inside baseball” of no interest to the common voter. But the insider scheme to unbind delegates and disenfranchise voters should concern every American.

Last week, the annual conference of the republican national lawyers association was held, with some 250 attorneys in attendance. The main topic of discussion: how to steal the nomination front presumptive nominee Donald Trump at the republican national convention. The RNLA is technically a separate entity from the RNC, though it is essentially made of elite establishment types who are attorneys representing special interests. At their recent meeting, the phrase “Never Trump” was bandied about in hushed tones quite a lot particularly after Trump lawyer Don McGahn left after a perfunctory short remarks. The doors were closed and locked after McGahn left.

Before that Washington insider Fred Barnes was the keynote speaker, and said that while he is not a “Never Trumper,” he knew that many in the room were. He said that Trump must make many changes to his policies if he hopes to unite the party. Barnes was overheard chortling that Trump was a “buffoon” at the cocktail party.

A smaller group huddled to discuss the rules committee of the RNC: Larry Levy, RNLA chairman and a partner of Rudy Guiliani; Randy Evans, RNLA chairman and national committeeman from GA; John Ryder, general counsel of the republican national committee and Jim Bopp of Citizens United fame and a national committeeman from IN and former RNC vice-chairman. I know these guys. Bopp is a patriot but the others are insiders. They blurted out their plan of attack.

Evans alluded to something congressman Trey Gowdy said the previous morning at the conference, about the importance republicans place on “process.” It is true, of course, that republicans care a great deal about the rule of law, constitutional due process and so on. But what Evans meant is something completely different—and sinister. He said “process” is extremely important to republicans, lawyers and thus all of us. Evans said that “process is important,” and urged the crowd of lawyers that “there is no such thing as a presumptive nominee.” Evans bluntly made the point that Trump has not won the nomination, Evans went on to say that there are many delegates in the “Never Trump” crowd and that many convention delegates will be so-minded. He also said that speaker Paul Ryan is in this camp and that Ryan is always on the rules committee, and will be the chair of the convention in Cleveland. Evans reminded the attorneys present that the convention is governed not by Robert’s rules of order, but by the rules of the house and asked rhetorically whether Trump could have someone at the convention who knows house rules as well as speaker Ryan.

Evans went on to “guarantee” there would be challenges to Trump’s delegates who were from states whose delegates were not exclusively chosen by republicans. Evans said that the challenges would be brought before the credentials committee, and that their ruling would come to the floor as the very first order of business. He then pointed out that Trump needs 1237 votes to win any vote, not merely a majority of those present and voting. He rhetorically asked the audience what would happen if 100, or 200, or more, delegates and their alternates could be persuaded to stay at their hotel that morning.

I predicted all this on Infowars.com months ago. The lobbyist class fueled by the donor class with their multi-national interests fear Trump’s nationalism. They will never try to stop him. The Trump juggernaut must be ready for this assault.

Evans even speculated as to what would happen if a motion were brought in the rules committee to make it such that only a person from Texas could be nominated on the floor. He wasn’t suggesting this, he made clear, he said he was merely illustrating that there are many, many ways “never Trump” forces could stop Trump. Another panelist said that Lindsey Graham would be at the convention, and that he is still looking for a role to play.

The other speakers echoed this theme, although Jim Bopp warned that if Evans’ predictions are true, it could mean the “end of the republican party.” Few other than Bopp seemed to care. Bopp said that he and Evans had “written” rule 40b, and that his explicit purpose had been to help Romney avoid a floor fight in 2012. He expects that a motion will be brought in the rules committee to amend it predicted that a motion would be brought to unbind all delegates on the first ballot. Bopp did say the party would be destroyed if the maneuver. Nobody cared.

The elites who now run the party that ended slavery are desperate and unhinged, willing to engage in any underhanded legal sophistry and shenanigans to subvert the will of their base voters. Every Republican needs to know about their plans and send support in some form or another to Cleveland to stop the steal.

Rockefeller, Rothschild, Prince Phillip, Bill Gates are all familiar names. In fact, no one really cares what they are up to at all. But then there are those who really like to know what they are up to and what they would like to do. Not so much what they could do for you, but rather what they might like to do to you. Especially when some people we know are said to appear in the most unlikely of places. These are people who, if we knew who they were, we might not sleep so well at nights.

WHO DO YOU KNOW ON THIS PAGE?
Is anyone here a friend of yours? Did you go to the same school? Stanley Kubrick did not go to the same school as the inbreds he filmed in Eyes Wide Open. But then, according to the Torah, we all descend from Noah. So we could all be inbreds....but then....?

If you cannot see the cartoons, or the photos below, this means that somebody does not want you to see them. And you know what that means.

Lord Jacob Rothschild meant, “They oversaw the economic collapse”.

Some short clips that reveal some interesting facts that most people do not care about, yet when the day comes that they have to care, you know they will care. but it will be too late.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/GMbOk1U8gh0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vI6rnSsdqg

The Good News is population growth issues are being addressed

What Does It Mean To Get Hot Under The Collar? 

Watch Prince Phillip get a little hot under the collar when population explosion is mentioned. Too many people create too much demand for food. Food shortages are not the reason for rises in the price of food. 

Less than 2 Billion people is not quite as bad as the 500 million written on the Georgia Guide Stones. Prince Phillip is so generous that he is willing to let 1.5 billion live.

Bill Gates has a population solution.

"If we do a really great job on new vaccines we could lower population growth."
Vaccines will save lives and population growth will be reduced. When lives are saved the good news is the population growth goes down. You know that makes sense, because Bill Gates said it.

How do you prevent population growth? Vaccination. Is vaccination the same as killing people? No. Killing people would mean that the population would be reduced. But if you vaccinate people this will save lives? People are given vaccination to save lives. So we can expect population growth if lives are being saved. No. The good news is with the vaccinations that we will promote, people lives will be saved and population growth will come down.

The math is simple.  Take 2 people who have 2 children and vaccinate them all Instead of having 4 people, we will have 0 people. See how the lives are saved. They do not have to worry anymore.

Just to help you understand how the math works here is the criteria and the equation

P = people
S = services per person
E = energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

CO2 = P+S+E+C 

This is what the equation means:

If we do a really great job....one of those the P, or S, or E, or C will have to come down close to 0. Which would be the most effective way to eliminate the CO2 problem.

The benefits of vaccines is a reduction of sickness and population growth. This is because when people die, they no longer get sick. Vaccines are effective means of assisting the reduction of CO2 because they can control population growth.

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ4MOBuYNOU9A813hyvevPZ2CeC0cqnQPxcDI56ZxvTTtsvpiHg1Q

 http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/106/590x/prince-philip-435380.jpg

http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/435380/Joking-Prince-Philip-is-back-to-his-best-as-he-visits-elderly-care-centre

HUMAN CLONES COMING SOON. CHINA OPENS MASSIVE FACTORY SO CLONES CAN BE EITHER SEX AND PEOPLE CAN HAVE MORE CHOICE. No Longer Will A Male And Female Be Required To Reproduce Offspring. Scary Science Or Brave New World Order Opening The Door For Bigger Fantasies To Become Real.

Scientists to open MASS-CLONING factory this year to clone cows, pets and HUMANS

SCIENTISTS in China are planning to open a mass-cloning factory by the end of the year.

By SEAN MARTIN

 UPDATED: 07:16, Tue, Apr 5, 2016

GETTY

A cloning factory will open in China by the end of the year

The ambitious and futuristic facility hopes to be mass-producing one million cows every 12 months by 2020.

Not only will it clone cattle, but the factory, which will be located in the northern Chinese port of Tianjin, will also cater to more specific needs by genetically engineering police dogs and thoroughbred race horses.

• 
  

GETTY

The scientists will mass-produce livestock for meat

It is part of a $21m plan which is backed by the Boyalife group in collaboration with South Korean company Sooam Biotech Research Foundation.

Xu Xiaochun, CEO of Boyalife, said: “Everything in the supermarket looks good – it’s almost all shiny, good-looking, and uniformly shaped. For animals, we weren’t able to do that in the past. 

“But with our cloning factory, we choose to do so now.

GETTY

Questions of ethics have risen about cloning

"The technology is already there.

"If this is allowed. I don't think there are other companies better than Boyalife that make better technology.”

While ethical questions are bound to rise, the US’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has said that “meat and milk from cow, pig, and goat clones and the offspring of any animal clones are as safe as food we eat every day.”

GETTY

It will bring pets back to life

There are currently no plans in the pipeline to clone and produce humans in a bid to eradicate disease, but Xiaochun has said that this can change if people become more open to the idea of it.

He said: "Unfortunately, currently, the only way to have a child is to have it be half its mum, half its dad.

"Maybe in the future you have three choices instead of one.

It was originally created with the view to cope with China’s increasing demand for meat, which will rise by another 2.2 million tonnes over the next decade, having shot up by 25 per cent in the last five years.

However, the ambition has grown, and the team hope to be cloning peoples’ beloved deceased pets eventually too.

”You either have fifty-fifty, or you have a choice of having the genetics 100 percent from Daddy or 100 percent from Mummy. This is only a choice.

“We want the public to see that cloning is really not that crazy, that scientists aren’t weird, dressed in lab coats, hiding behind a sealed door doing weird experiments.”

Inside the factory will be a 15,000 square metre laboratory, an animal centre and a gene bank.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/658057/CLONING-factory-to-launch-producing-cattle-pets-and-eventually-HUMANS

Scientists move one step closer to CLONING T-Rex

RELATED ARTICLES

• 
  Scientists clonelions after finding 'perfect' frozen cubs

MOSES & Exodus

Amazing evidence of Red Sea Crossing

MOSES & Exodus part 3

The world is infinitely more complex than we can imagine. Especially, those structural understandings that shape our perception of the world.

Questioning Our Core Beliefs

Cassius Kamarampi | April 4, 2016

The world is infinitely more complex than we can imagine: acceptance of this fact is an essential first step to humbling oneself, to dropping our preconceived notions and accepting the momentary pain of being incorrect, in favor of an entire future where we can strive to know the truth.

Those structural understandings that shape your perception of the world: do you really know those things? Do you have proof for those foundational beliefs, or did you believe what you were told? If you believed what you were told, it’s okay. I believed what I was told too, even though I intuitively felt that nothing was right from the earliest memory of my existence.

As many of us know, nothing is as it seems. Around every last corner, every twist and turn in the path of our lives, another deception is there. For example, the history of slavery in the US and elsewhere, the conquering of Native People in the Americas, is whitewashed and severely warped out of context in our education in American public school. We are told that if the FDA says it is so, it is so, and we can safely consume things that other studies and pieces of knowledge irrefutably prove to be toxic and harmful.

We are told that it’s okay to give 4 year old children amphetamines for ADD: yes, that’s real. Tens of thousands of children around the age of 4 are given Adderall every day.
Every governmental body does something different from what we are told: we are led to believe that forces of order and good are dominating factors in constructing our society, when in reality money, money and the shrewd, scheming, suit and tie wearing blandness of trickery dominates our society. Money bleeds us, sinks its tentacles into the alleged regulatory bodies that decorate this system and turn the blades of the machine against us, like the prison industrial complex.

This doesn’t have to be a grim, dark reality: this is a liberating, clarity bringing, profoundly beautiful and life altering change of mind.

The darkness of awakening should only be a first symptom in a process through which we find a path: an acquisition of clarity.

Clarity, peace of mind, deep acceptance of the state of the world is often the blessing at the end of the dark, and sometimes very bright, tunnel of the world we were born into.
As a person born in 1996 in the United States, certain questions pervaded every minute of my childhood:

-Why do I get the feeling my teachers are not right about what they tell us?
-Why does everyone seem clueless, making decisions that I can feel are not right?
-What is this food made of?
-Why are there so many unhealthy, sickly, ill people around?
-Where does our food come from?
-Where did we come from?
-Why do I have to get so many vaccines?
-Why is there so much crime?
-Who owns the buildings downtown?
-Why does everything look abandoned and decayed? (That’s how the Midwestern US looked in the late 90’s, and how it looks today, around Chicago, Detroit, Flint Michigan, South Bend Indiana, where I am from.)

My life has been nothing but a path to answering these questions.
My intuition, my gut instinct told me nothing was right in this society from the earliest moments of my memory. I could always tell that people were not as sure as they should be, about the things they insisted were true.

Having been born into the run-down midwestern US in the mid 90’s, from my perspective it has always been very obvious that we’re living in some end-result of a lot of bad decisions. I wasn’t born in Yemen, just into a very strange haze of “system.”
I’ve always known deep within myself that there is more truth to uncover: I’ve always intuitively known that there are more layers. Even deep into my awakening, I had the feeling there were more layers. Which layer will I stumble upon next? The compelling, fascinating intensity of that question keeps me going.

Just when we think we’ve seen everything, something else tells us that there are even deeper layers to this enigmatic onion that is the reality of our existence: the reality of the world’s social structures, power structures, the true history of where we came from and why everything is the way it is. Isn’t it the sweetest thing when you break into a layer of life that ends up being useful: when a new craft, a new skill or understanding comes into your life? When music hits you, possibly one of the most beautiful and unique components of our perception on Earth.

While we can marvel and the complexity of existence and appreciate life, do you think you have it figured out?

Well, where did that plastic come from in the water bottle you’re drinking out of? It’s plastic number 7. That plastic is probably sealed with Bisphenol S, even though it says BPA free. If you don’t pay attention now, one day you might wake up with prostate cancer.
Do you think you know everything you need to know to make the right decisions in life? Do you recognize what you need to do to have a future, or will you keep eating, keep running on the treadmill with the hope that the flow of food to your plate will not cease, and the gears that prop up your life will never stop?

I certainly get the feeling that there’s still more to learn. Just this month I had an awakening about plastic, poisons, and I began to understand that the taste I can detect when I drink my non-flouride water, contained in allegedly BPA-free plastic containers, is actually Bisphenol S. Plastic number 7 is often sealed with Bisphenol S, almost the exact same kind of endocrine disrupting, cancer causing chemical as BPA.

My sense of taste is more my friend than I ever thought it could be: I’ve become more aware of an odd taste in water that is supposed to be pure, a chemical odor in the air when it shouldn’t be there.

Where did that keyboard you’re typing on come from? What is it made of?
Who made the food you eat, what chemicals were used to preserve it, and what is the true cause of the debilitating health problems you may have seen your family members succumb to?

The reality of the world we live in, what everything is made of, where we came from, and how we were steered into this direction as a society, it’s an onion with infinite layers.
We live in an enigmatic onion with infinite layers: the sooner a person becomes humble enough to question their deepest and most firmly ingrained preconceived notions of the world, the sooner they can become wise and make the best decisions: come to the deepest peace with the clarity of understanding how things really are, even if reality can be dark.

Sometimes, our choice of what layers to uncover in life just has to be dark, out of necessity: where we are at now, what often motivates us to dig deeper is something kind of negative, maybe learning about what causes cancer when a family member gets it, or maybe we are compelled to learn about the Federal Reserve after years of drudgery going to college to be a lawyer.

If everything were well in the world, we could divert our energy to discovering more positive things: new crafts, skills, ways to improve the lives of us and those around us. We have to do both at once: we have to shape our culture with intent, every aspect of our lives, and completely disconnect from the systems and processes that have failed to serve us well up until this point.

We have to preserve our passion for life, our positive attitude, our endurance and undying fire of humanity, if we’re going to learn about the critically important to understand problems of our world, work to make them better, and work to ensure that our children have a future.
(http://www.eraofwisdom.org)

POWER LIBERTY QUOTES THAT WILL INSPIRE YOU TO LIVE: Free From Tyranny, Free From Slavery, Free From Intimidation, So You Can Secure Your Rights

By Joseph Jankowski

Within the United States today, we see ever increasing bureaucracy with a strong stranglehold on the personal liberties which we are supposed to believe we are in total possession of.

With the rise of the police state, NSA spying, and extremely dangerous executive orders, America has fallen in many of the metrics that rank countries based on their level of freedom.

The American way of life that once looked at government as an entity which the people should avoid being parasitic to, and as an institution that should remain as small as possible, has gone completely to the wayside.

A profound example of how large the U.S. federal government has grown is the fact that the Department of Health and Human Services is set to spend over $1 trillion in 2016. That is just one agency out of hundreds.

Our once free society now labors to pay off big government.

In America today, it is those who cherish freedom who are labeled as dangerous.A study by the Department of  Homeland Security has labeled “those who are reverent of individual liberty” as potential terrorists.

According to this Department of Defense manual, people concerned with “individual liberties, states’ rights, and how to make the world a better place” are potential extremists. .

Freedom is under siege in America.

Of course, the only way to turn this around and restore our liberties is to get motivated.

Here are 8 liberty quotes that will surely get you in the spirit to live free:

Joseph Jankowski is a contributor for PlanetFreeWill.com.