Having a heart of gold doesn't just mean that you are generous or an easy touch; it may mean you have the prospects of a long life.
Givers are unlike takers; they don't fret over who is going to take from them.
Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? (Matthew 6:25)
A comedian might say laughter is the best medicine, but an economist will claim that gold is best for preserving wealth.
Economists see no value in thinking about non-material things nor not attributing a cost to everything that exists.
Assessing life as priceless, just doesn't cut it, when talking to an "eco" — economist not an ecologist, which is a different species, and more likely to be green and wet behind the ears, rather than hardened by reality.
Listening to "gold bugs" pumping the highs and lows of their beloved metal and the rights and wrongs of the monetary system, like heavy metal, their drum beat is too much to bear.
Even listening to numerous expert financial wizards (deluded mostly) is depressing. The world is going to end. The US dollar is going to crash, if not this week, next, and if not this coming month, next month, and if not this year, by the end of the next.
BRICS is going to sink the US dollar according to a majority of pundits. How's this going to happen? Nobody is going to use the dollar anymore to buy goods outside the USA.
The USA still has the largest:
Economy
Banks
Stock exchange
Multinationals
Military expenditure
The combined population of BRICS countries is some ten times the population of the USA, and potentially a much larger consumer base than the US.
The BRICS countries consist of around 46% of the world’s population.
India
1,428,627,663
China
1,425,671,352
Brazil
216,422,446
Russia
144,444,359
Ethiopia
126,527,060
Egypt
112,716,598
Iran
89,172,767
South Africa
60,414,495
Saudi Arabia
36,947,025
EAU
9,516,871
Total
3,650,460,636
BRICS has the population base. However, let's have a look at how many US dollars their currencies buy.
Knowing how many US dollars would be needed to buy one of every BRICS member's currency ought to give us an indication how soon the dollar is going to crash.
On the 20th of January, 2024, the combined BRICS currencies could buy 98 cents US.
Brazilian Real buys US$0.20c
Russian Ruble buys US$0.01c
Indian Rupee buys US$0.01c
Chinese Yuan buys US$0.14c
South African Rand buys US$0.05c
Egyptian Pound buys US$0.03c
Ethiopian Birr buys US$0.01c
Iranian Rial buys US$0.00002c
Saudi Arabia Riyal buys US$0.26c
United Arab Emirati Dirham buys US$0.27c
Argentina pulled out of BRICS and adopted the US dollar as its official currency after the election of Javier Milei as president. Argentina would have added the value of $0.001 cent, and the total BRICS currency value would still be close to 2 cents short of $US1.00.
The U.S. dollar is the most widely used currency in the world because of its stability and is likely to remain the global currency of choice until perhaps a global digital money system is patently accepted.
Pegged
There are five higher valued currencies pegged to the US dollar:
One Cayman Island’s dollar buys $1.21. Cayman's is a tax haven.
One Jordanian Dinar buys $1.41 for no other reason than it is pegged
One Omani Rial buys $2.59 and has stability and oil.
One Bahrain Dinar buys $2.65 and also has stability and oil.
One Kuwaiti Dinar buys $3.23; oil rich and has stability.
If the above currencies were not pegged, except for Jordan and the Cayman Islands, their currencies probably would be similar to the UAE Dirham ($US0.27c).
Floating
When it comes to floating currencies, the US dollar, however, is worth less than the Euro, the Swiss Franc and the British Pound.
One $US1.00 only buys €0.91.
One US1.00 only buys CHF0.86.
One US1.00 only buys £0.76.
Approximate population figures:
United States — 360 million
European Union — 450 million
Switzerland — 8.9 million
United Kingdom — 68 million
What is evident, population figures are not where the value in currency is found.
Productivity is where the value is found. More to the point, that value belongs to whoever owns and controls that productivity.
The EU has more productivity than the USA. Much of this comes out of Germany, which is currently being purposely deindustrialized as major manufacturing moves to the southern USA.
Switzerland is where the Bank of International Settlements resides, along with much of the world's gold.
The United Kingdom is all about the City of London, which controls the US Fed and the world's financial system.
Production is the basis for an economy. Those who control this, whether they own it or not, are the ones who have the wealth. Once we understand this, the complexities of the world’s economic system are easier to negotiate.
NATO exists to keep the USA controlling Europe, Germany down and Russia out of Europe.
Russia has done better economically than what NATO expected, but it has had to raise interest rates, currently 16% to prevent people from putting cash under their mattresses and creating an economic crisis from a run on banks.
British Primatologist Jane Goodal made a statement at 2020's World Economic Forum (WEF) indicating that if Earth's population was that of the 1500s (under 500 million), many of the (perceived) problems would be resolved (for the elite).
The Georgia Guidestones no longer state Earth’s population should be 500 million—they have been destroyed.
Destroy
The Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts received an invitation to WEF (2024), whereupon he issued an imprecatory statement denouncing Klaus Schwab and attendees as hypocritical Marxists, private-jet environmentalists, and genocide-adjacent humanitarians. When in attendance, he stated that everything that has been proposed by the WEF needs to be rejected.
Dutch farmers have been offered generous buyouts if they quit, so farms can be destroyed to house migrants. Meanwhile, the Dutch Queen defends “digital ID”.
Why does the Bible call people who say there is no God, fools, and does this include atheists, or are fools those who seek God out? Some claim that the Bible does not refer to atheists; therefore, when the Bible refers to fools this does not include atheists as being fools.
So what is an atheist? Is an atheist a fool?
My understanding is an atheist is someone who does not believe that God exists. Atheists say that there is no God because they prefer to think that there is no God.
Does the modern-day idea of an atheist concur with the biblical concept of a fool?
Here are three definitions:
Atheism:
“Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods.”
(Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014)
Clearly, the current definition concurs with my understanding of an atheist: someone who does not accept that the Almighty Creator God, the Supreme Being exists.
The Bible states:
The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none that does good. The Lord looks down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there are any that act wisely, that seek after God. (Psalm 14:1-2)
In the pride of his countenance the wicked does not seek him; all his thoughts are, “There is no God.” (Psalm 10:4)
To suggest that the above verses do not describe modern-day atheists; we could say is a specious attempt by a clown trying to hoodwink the gullible.
An atheist could either be very immoral and possess no principles at all or be immoral, as far as God is concerned, because he or she is full of pride, has his or her own standards, and thinks to ignore the Omniscient One (by outrunning death at the final bell?).
Atheists are people whom the Bible calls, “Fools.” Some people are so precious they are offended by that. Bear in mind, offense is always taken and never given. (Since the Bible gives no person permission to take offense at what is written therein, if you do take offence, could this mean that you are stealing, if stealing means taking something without permission.)
The Bible records Jesus as saying that those who take no offense are blessed.
When I was a fool, I used to take offense. Now I know a fool ceases to be one when he or she becomes wise. A wise person would seek to find the reason why one is here on this Earth merely to be born, experience suffering in its various forms, then die, and yet be capable of mental torment by formulating the concept of eternity.
Atheists do not believe that God exists. Therefore, they believe they are not accountable for their actions to any Judge once they die. This is why the Bible views people as fools when they say that there is no God; especially, when they believe they will not have to give an account of their actions to a Superior Being—such as a Supreme Being with an Omniscient Mind who judges with righteousness and not with partiality, as the corrupt in this world do.
If you showed an atheist a fragment of bone and said that this came from a giant creature that weighed 40 ton and lived 40 million years ago, as long as you said that this creature’s existence occurred by an evolutionary process that relies upon chance, the atheist would believe you.
If you took three balls and told an atheist you are going do five things with them; he or she would at least listen to see what kind of juggling trick you proposed (James Randy would, anyway). You could tell the atheist what you are going to do along the following lines:
1. You are going to throw one ball into the air and it is going to remain stationary.
2. You are going to then get a ball and cause it to spin on your finger.
3. Then you are going to take a third ball and cause it to circle the one on your finger.
4. Having done that, you are going to take the ball circling the spinning ball that is on your finger and toss them into the air so that together they will circle the stationary ball.
5. Then this is going to continue for ten minutes without any strings attached.
The atheist would say that is impossible. If that were to happen that would be a miracle.
Yet the Creator of the Universe has the a moon circling the planet Earth that spins on its axis and together they travel at nearly 70, 000 miles around the Sun every 365.4 days and, evidently, these objects have been doing so for much longer than a mere ten minutes. However, the atheist says that this incredible marvel is merely a result of chance.
Show an inquisitive person a trick and he will seek to find out how it is designed. However, if you were to show a fool a marvel, the fool would not believe it was designed but had to happen by chance. Yet it would have to be a miracle that by chance the Earth spins on its axis and the moon circles the Earth. This is why the Bible calls people, fools, who say that there is no Creator God. Clearly an Intelligent Designer caused both the spinning Earth and its revolving moon to orbit the Sun together at close to 70,000 mph (and we have not begun to speak of the amazing reliability and uniformity of the seemingly unfathomable complexities contained within the otherwise hostile Universe in which we live).
Whichever way you look at the atheists’ dilemma, the Bible has them pegged as fools. They are either fools because they do not believe and acknowledge the Lord God Creator of Heaven and Earth (i.e. the Universe), or they are fools because they believe in the impossible: the principles of life and order in the Universe occur by chance through a series of accidental and unpredictable events.
Yet the Bible says that only a fool is wise in his own eyes. Atheists think that they are wiser than the Creator God. Instead of being full of pride, if they were humble, they would act wisely and seek after God. They would do their utmost to call God into account and find out their reason for existence; except atheists see this as the providence of fools, whereas the Bible says that is the what the wise would do. However, atheists prefer to scoff at those who testify that God lives and then warn them that He is going to judge those who refuse to reason with Him about their futile lives; but by seeking out God and securing their own assurance of eternal life while they have the opportunity, they would avoid an unfavorable eternal judgment.
Yet if an atheist went on a plane trip across the Pacific from, say, Chile to China, and if he or she were not warned that there would be insufficient fuel to fly across the ocean if the plane encounters head winds, and it does, and the plane mysteriously disappears somewhere in the ocean, there would be uproar. The families of the deceased passengers would want justice. As it happens, the Bible warns all atheists that after death comes judgment.
The Ten Commandments were given 3500 years ago. God Himself wrote them. In fact, the only words ever attested to have been written by God’s own finger. If we do not live up to them, and these are the standard to what we are going to be held account, we would expect a wise person would get to know what he or she is up against before death. And if one could not meet the requirements, at least, one could seek to discover an alternative option before time is up.
One option is you could seek Jesus Christ out, before you die. I did. I now have the personal assurance that Jesus rose from the dead, and I did not get that assurance reading the Bible. I obtained this assurance from seeking the resurrected Lord of Life, who paid the price to redeem us from the futility of being born to suffer and then die, even though we have the capacity to conceptualize the possibility of eternal life. My inability to meet the required standard that would make me eligible for eternal life is no longer an issue for me; moreover, I have a personal guarantee in the form of an abiding assurance that this is so. It just so happens, the Bible instructs us to obtain this abiding assurance before we die and not to rely upon doctrines or philosophies of men, which equates to church dogma that masquerades as truth.
Hence, the Bible contrasts a fool with a wise person. A fool is someone who thinks there is no God or says that God does not exist—as an atheist thinks and says—but a wise person seeks the Creator God out. Nothing appears to have changed in this respect since the Psalms were written, except in the New Testament we learn that a fool is someone like me who has sought Lord Jesus Christ and found Him. The New Testament states that I am a fool for Christ’s sake. And all the atheists agree!!
The European Commission is unelected; its bureaucrats and
commissioners are appointed. As legislatures and political parties become less
representative, a growing chorus is worrying that the people will see no reason
to obey.
The
kommissars therefore ponder if the best way to stop opposition is to ban it.
The EC
president Ursula von der Leyen told the World Economic Forum that “for the
global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not
conflict or climate. It is disinformation and misinformation.”
As the
European Commission is run by corporations and bureaucrats — the Parliament is
purely advisory, largely toothless — she was telling the truth when she said
she spoke for “the global business community.”
European
Members of
Parliament (MEPs) last week voted 349 to 254 to keep the Commission’s contracts
with Pfizer and other Covid-19 “vaccine” companies a secret, successfully
blocking public access to vital data regarding the EU’s dealings with shady Big
Pharma enterprises.
It is little
surprise that the European Parliament building in Strasbourg is redolent of the
Tower of Babel, whose construction God confounded by making the people speak
different languages. Does that hint at the power dynamics desired by the owner
investors?
The Bible records that, from the beginning of mankind’s existence, he has rebelled against God. In fact, many stories recount people’s attempts to distance themselves from the true Creator in act of defiance. The Tower of Babel was on of the first examples of such behavior as written in Genesis 11:1-4.
Now the whole world had one language and a common speech. As people moved eastward, they found a plain in Shinar and settled there.
They said to each other, “Come, let’s make bricks and bake them thoroughly.” They used brick instead of stone, and tar for mortar. Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves; otherwise we will be scattered over the face of the whole earth.” ~ Genesis 11:1-4 – NIV
Before God intervened by confusing their languages and scattering the people across the Earth as depicted in Genesis 11:5-9, people were worshiping Bel (Baal), the god of Babylon under the control and influence of Nimrod. It was clear to the Lord that whenever people get together in apparent harmony in the name of world peace without the King of kings, Jesus Christ, immediate plans to overthrown Him would follow.
The superstate known as the European Union (EU) seems to have plans to accomplish what its ancestors could not do with the Tower of Babel. This time backed up by the fourth beast, the Vatican, and its soldiers, the Jesuit Order. The idea the European States should unite in order to avoid conflict between themselves is a product of Hegelian dialect as the major wars are known to be manipulated in accordance with the will of the elites.
The New Tower of Babel
The EU is currently composed by 28 member states that agreed to form a political-economic that aims the free circulation of people, goods, services, and capital. Nevertheless, its Parliament building in the city of Strasbourg, France stroke the attention of many who saw eerie similarity with the Tower of Babel depicted by artist Pieter Bruegel. The unfinished portion at the top of the Parliament building is explained in metaphoric terms related to the ongoing transformation of the European culture. However, the resemblance is so evident that even Jesuit trained and Roman-Catholic raised Glenn Beck had to point it out.
This fact can’t be denied as one examines the official EU poster once put out to promote the EU Parliament. Apparently, its Luciferian references were so blatant that it was withdrawn thanks to Christian’s protests.
The tower in the center is a clear depiction of Bruegel’s Tower of Babel, which makes nearly impossible to deny where their inspiration for this enterprise came from. At the top of the tower, it’s possible to see 11 upside down stars, or pentagrams. This symbolism is oftentimes used by dark occultist in order to conjure up the powers of evil. Moreover, the motto read at the bottom right corner which reads “Europe: many tongues, one voice” is a clear allusion to the confusion of tongues promoted by God. However, the statement makes clear that despite the apparent differences in language and costumes, the members of the European Union think and act as one voice. The elite ambition to exalt themselves above the Lord and finally finish Nimrod’s work was never extinguished and it’s as strong as ever before.
Catholic Roots of the EU
The founding fathers of the European Union project, which started out in 1952 as the European Coal and Steel Community, were known to be devout Catholics and as a consequence were greatly influenced by the Encyclicals put out by Popes Leo XIII and Pius XI. Catholic historian Alan Fimister affirms that on his interview to Zenit.
The first European Community was the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) from which the other communities developed. These were eventually merged into the European Community and then placed within the larger framework of the European Union, which now includes intergovernmental cooperation on security and foreign affairs as well as the “communitarian” supranational tasks of the original community.
The political leaders who founded the ECSC were overwhelmingly Catholic: Robert Schuman was intensely loyal to the faith and affirmed publicly that papal encyclicals “define Catholic doctrine and bind in conscience” Konrad Adenauer and Alcide de Gaspari were also particularly important. The coal and steel plan was drawn up by an official, Jean Monnet, who became the first man to hold the office which is now called President of the Commission. He was not a committed Catholic but the essential architecture for the institutions was already being advocated by Schuman before Monnet came to him with his own project.
Adenauer and de Gaspari were both strongly influenced by Leo XIII’s teaching and its intellectual legacy. Schuman was directly influenced by Maritain’s conception of supranational democracy as the foundation for a New Christendom. “Europe,” said Schuman, is “the establishment of a generalized democracy in the Christian sense of the word.” ~ Interview of Catholic historian Alan Fimister to Zenit
Konrad Adenauer would be one of the six European leaders that agreed to the Treaty of Rome of 1957 that eventually helped solidify the creation of the EU. Five of the six signatories went from the Capitoline Hill to the Vatican for a Papal blessing. Interestingly, the document signed that day was blank.
Thomas Aquinas, a famous Catholic philosopher and theologian, greatly influenced the work of Pope Leo XIII and his many Encyclicals on social justice. Thomism as a philosophical school that teaches among other things that the possession of things in common is the natural law which enforces the socialist idea of communal possessions. In his Summa Theologica, Aquinas lays down the Vatican’s communist agenda of wealth redistribution and social justice.
Community of goods is ascribed to the natural law, not that the natural law dictates that all things should be possessed in common and that nothing should be possessed as one’s own: but because the division of possessions is not according to the natural law, but rather arose from human agreement which belongs to positive law, as stated above (II-II:57:3). Hence the ownership of possessions is not contrary to the natural law, but an addition thereto devised by human reason. ~ Summa Theologica1
Pope Leo XIII went on to write the Encyclical Rerum Novarum, which to this date is seen as one of the most influential Vatican document on social justice. The document and himself were heavily influenced by Jesuit scholar Luigi Taparelli. In fact, Taparelli is claimed to have coined the term “social justice” and Rerum Novarum clearly channels his socialist ideas with terms such as “proletarian” and phrases like “…the spirit of revolutionary change…”.
Exactly 40 years later, Pope Pius XI issued the encyclical Quadragesimo anno that covered the ethical implications of the social and economic order. Similar to Rerum Novarum, Jesuit theologians such as German social philosophers Gustav Gundlach and Königswinterer Kreis contributed with the document formulation . Roman Catholic theologian and sociologist Oswald von Nell-Breuning was also critical in the encyclical drafting.
For the most part, Quadragesimo anno reiterates and salutes Pope’s Leo XIII encyclical as an instrumental tool that legitimated an effective influence of the Church over government affairs. The following quote from Quadragesimo anno reaffirmed that Roman Catholic principles had in fact permeated secular venues without being noticed.
Under the guidance and in light of Leo’s encyclical was thus evolved a truly Christian social science, which continues to be fostered and enriched daily by the tireless labours of those picked men whom we have named the auxiliaries of the Church…The doctrine of Rerum Novarum began little by little to penetrate among those who, being outside Catholic unity, do not recognize the authority of the Church; and these Catholic principles of sociology gradually became part of the intellectual heritage of the whole human race…Thus too, we rejoice that the Catholic truths proclaimed so vigorously by our illustrious Predecessor [Leo XIII in 1891’s Rerum Novarum], are advanced and advocated not merely in non-Catholic books and journals, but frequently also in legislative assemblies and in courts of justice. ~ Pius XI2
Oswald von Nell-Breuning, who also was a Jesuit, developed the principle of subsidiarity which plays a key role in the political interplay between the EU governing body and its members. In short, it guarantees every member state is able to take actions to achieve its objectives. However, whenever it’s not possible the EU may interfere for the good of all.
Ultimately, these teachings would form the basis for the Jesuit created doctrine of Communism and it first application in their reduction settlements in South America. From there, it would be used again in countries like Russia and China via revolutionary Jesuit educated Karl Marx and Jesuit priest Joseph Stalin. Professor Walter J. Veith has a great teaching on Roman Catholic social justice.
“Founding Fathers”
In the same way as the American experiment, the EU has its own founding fathers. However, while the former nation was constructed based on protestant ideology the later was a Vatican bastion since its inception. Most of the founders were Roman Catholic themselves and/or Jesuit trained.
German statesman Konrad Adenauer was a devout Roman Catholic that certainly pleased the Vatican as being granted membership in the Order of Holy Sepulcher, Teutonic Order, Order of the Golden Spur, and the highest order of chivalry awarded by the Pope: Supreme Order of Christ. He’s also listed as one of the notable alumni of the University of Freiburg, which traces its origins to the Jesuits;
Luxembourgian politician Joseph Bech was a Roman Catholic. He’s also a notable alumni of the University of Freiburg;
Dutch banker and politician Johan Beyen was a Dutch banker with no apparent ties to Rome. However, Wikipedia in German states that despite his parents being protestants he later converted to Catholicism;
British statesman and Prime Minister of the UK Winston Churchill was a high level freemason;
The Roman Catholic faith of founding fathers like Konrad Adenauer, Alcide de Gasperi, and Robert Schuman was credited as the inspiration for creating the EU. Pope John Paul II not only exalted the aforementioned founder, but also provided interesting information on what happened before the Treaty of Paris was signed.
Dear friends, in these days in which you are reflecting on Europe, it is natural to recall that among the principal promotors of the reunification of this continent were men inspired by profound Christian faith, like Adenauer, De Gasperi and Schuman. How can we underestimate, for example, the fact that, in 1951, before beginning the delicate negotiations which would lead to the adoption of the Treaty of Paris, they wished to meet in a Benedictine monastery on the Rhine for meditation and prayer?3
The Roman Catholic Church started the process of canonization of both Robert Schuman and Alcide de Gasperi. Schuman is backed by Polish Catholics that seem more careful of his candidacy than the Vatican itself. If any of the processes goes through, it will be the first time a secular political leader is elevated to sainthood. This only reflects the priceless contributions these men gave to the Vatican-Jesuit plans in Europe.
The speculations involving Marian influence in the flag design were confirmed in an interview Heitz gave to Lourdes magazine and in a testimony of a Catholic priest called Pierre Caillon at the time when meeting Heitz.
Secondly, it is worth noting the testimony of Father Pierre Caillon, who refers to a meeting with Arsène Heitz. Caillon tells of having met the former Council of Europe employee by chance in August 1987 at Lisieux in front of the Carmelite monastery. It was Heitz who stopped him and declared ‘I was the one who designed the European flag. I suddenly had the idea of putting the 12 stars of the Miraculous Medal of the Rue du Bac on a blue field. My proposal was adopted unanimously on 8 December 1955, the Feast of the Immaculate Conception. I am telling you this, Father, because you are wearing the little blue cross of the Blue Army of Our Lady of Fatima’(272) .4
The official explanation for the flag given by the Council of Europe in 1955 explains that the stars represent the European people united together. The twelve stars are a symbol of completeness and perfection. In fact, the number 12 is referenced in the Bible many times with strong connotations.
The Meaning of Numbers: The Number 12
Twelve can be found in 187 places in God’s word. Revelation alone has 22 occurrences of the number. The meaning of 12, which is considered a perfect number, is that it symbolizes God’s power and authority, as well as serving as a perfect governmental foundation. It can also symbolize completeness or the nation of Israel as a whole. For example, Jacob (Israel) had twelve sons, each of which represented a tribe begun by a prince, for 12 princes total. Ishmael, who was born to Abraham through Hagar, also had twelve princes.
God specified that twelve unleavened cakes of bread be placed every week in the temple with frankincense next to each of the two piles that were to be made. The priests were commanded to change the bread every Sabbath day (Leviticus 24).
Christ called and choose twelve men to bear witness to what he did and to spread the good news of the gospel to the entire world. After he was raised from the dead, Jesus told the eleven disciples (Judas had killed himself) that God had given him ALL power and authority in both earth and heaven (God’s divine authority – Matthew 28:18).
Twelve thousand from each tribe of Israel (144,000 total) will receive salvation during the end time’s Great Tribulation (Revelation 7). Another set of 144,000 (12 x 12,000) will be taken from earth in order to serve and follow the Lamb of God (Revelation 14:1 – 5). Christ’s bride in Revelation 12, the church, wears a crown containing twelve stars.
New Jerusalem, which is made in heaven and brought to the earth by God himself, contains 12 gates made of pearl which are each manned by an angel. Over each gate will be one of the names of Israel’s twelve tribes. The walls are 144 cubits high (12 multiplied by itself – Revelation 21:16 – 17), with the city itself being 12,000 furlongs square.5
Indeed, numerology is a key component in the Jesuit World Order machinations. Boldly proclaiming their union as complete and perfect is a direct affront to the Lord and His Law. Professor Javier Paredes from the University of Alcala Spain talks about another “coincidence” regarding numbers and dates.
“However, in Heitz’s soul the words of the Apocalypse were very present: ‘A great sign appeared in the Heavens: a Woman clothed with the sun and with the moon at her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.’ And, perhaps without realizing it, the delegates of the European Ministers officially adopted the design proposed by Heitz on the feast of Our Lady: December 8, 1955,” explained Prof. Paredes. “That’s a lot of coincidences, so henceforth it should not be difficult for us to discover in the folds of the Europeans’ flag the smile and affection of Our Mother, the Queen of Europe, ready to lend a hand in that great challenge that St. Peter’s successor has proposed to us: to re-Christianize the Old Continent with the example of our lives and the testimony of our words.”6
Perhaps the term re-Christianize should be rewritten as counter-reform which better reflects the real plans of the Jesuit Order. It’s interesting to note that the city of Alcala in Spain was one of the favorite places of Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus.
We are all Jesuits
It was with this bold statement that the former president of the European Council, Herman van Rompuy, was quoted by the Dutch Catholic newspaper: the ‘Katholiek Nieuwsblad’. Dutch political analyst Derk Jan Eppink noticed well the similarities between the EU and Jesuit methodologies.
Listening to Van Rompuy, you will instantly notice the similarities of the Jesuits with Europe. Jesuits formed the vanguard of the Catholic Church, like the European elite is the vanguard of the European integration. Both portray themselves as ‘the elite’, elevated above the ordinary people. Their methods are very similar. A sophisticated lie or purposeful deception is allowed when framed in the interest of the greater goal. A barely contained cynicism typifies the attitude toward the normal citizen, the ignorant fool, who within a democracy needs to be protected from himself. The Catholic and European elites work through inner circles. The rest is prose. Van Rompuy, Barroso, Monti and Rajoy are frequent visitors at papal audiences.7
Once one starts to investigate some of the people who occupy the highest offices in the EU, it’s clear that Rompuy is being truthful and accurate.
Italian Roman Catholic, economist and politician Romano Prodi was the European Commission President from 1999 to 2004. He was thoroughly involved with Goldman Sachs, which was quoted by Pope Benedict XVI as doing the “work of God”. Prodi became a teaching assistant for Beniamino Andreatta, an Italian economist and politician. Andreatta studied at the Liceo Classico Giovanni Prati in Trento, which is run by the Jesuits. It’s conceivable that Andreatta would pass his Jesuit training on to one of his collaborators, Prodi;
Roman Catholic Portuguese Jose Manuel Barroso was the European Commission President from 2004 to 2014. Currently, Barroso works for Goldman Sachs International. He did PhD research at Jesuit Georgetown University. He also has a degree for the same institution on Leadership Seminar;
Roman Catholic, Belgian politician Herman Van Rompuy was the first president of the European Council from 2010 to 2014. Rompuy attended St John Berchmans College in Brussels, which is Jesuit secondary school. Later on, he worked as a lecturer at the Lessius Hogeschool, a Catholic college named after Jesuit Leonard Lessius;
Donald Tusk is Roman Catholic, Polish politician that has been the president of the European Council since 2014. Tusk was an active organizer and supporter of the Solidarity Trade Union in Poland, a movement that was greatly influenced by the Catholic social teaching. He wrote his M.A. thesis under professor Roman Wapiński advisory at the University of Gdańsk. Wapiński received his Doctor honoris cause from the University of Wrocław, which was early converted into a Jesuit school and an important instrument of the Counter-Reformation;
Many believed the result of June 2016 Referendum that voted for the withdraw of the UK from the EU was a great blow to the globalists and their New World Order. Brexit was also taken as a protestant response to the Roman/Vatican tradition of centralization of power. It’s interesting to note that some Catholics believe that the reason the EU is falling apart is because it became godless and, for that reason, needs to come back to its Catholic roots. Similarly to the researchers who claim that only recently the Vatican is being taken by malignant forces, people hold to the idea that only now the EU has turned away from God. In reality, it has always been this way and it was planned to be like this.
Nevertheless, there are always those skeptical enough that prefer to analyze the situation without being influenced by the media. One of them is Professor Veith who again has a great take on Brexit in light of Bible prophecy.
It’s very important not to forget that the British crown belongs to Rome and the Pope since king John (1167-1216) gave Concession of England and Ireland to Pope Innocent III. This was done as the king wanted to have a lift on his excommunication and the interdict placed on the churches of England following a quarrel with the Pope over choosing a new archbishop of Canterbury. King John ended up capitulating to the Pope as he was facing pressure from invasions and revolts of his own people. As a result of king John’s surrender to the Vatican, Pope Innocent III declared the Magna Carta just signed by the king as invalid.
King John broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215. Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the loss of the Crown (right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church. It says so quite plainly. To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal monarchs of England by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent III annulled the Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict (prohibition) on the entire British empire. From that time until today, the English monarchy and the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope. ~ Khondakar Golam Mowla, The Judgment Against Imperialism, Fascism and Racism Against Caliphate and Islam volume 2 (AuthorHouse, 2008)
From that time on, the British Crown belonged legally to the Pope. Bearing that in mind, it’s reasonable to think that any major decision taken by the British government or the Queen has to have the approval of the Vatican. Including, of course, Brexit. It’s also critical to point out that, as Vatican City and Washington DC, the city of London is a sovereign state. It has its own territory, flag, police and role, which in the case of the City of London is to be the financial center of the world. The former mayor of the City of London, Boris Johnson, was in favor of Brexit while the Prime Minister David Cameron was not. Despite that, Cameron was the one who called for a referendum, which result only brought him trouble.
Following Cameron’s resignation, Theresa May assumed as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. If Hillary Clinton is elected the 45th president of the United States, three of the most powerful nations of the world will be controlled by women: Angela Merkel in Germany, Theresa May in UK, and Hillary Clinton in the US. This corroborates what the prophet Isaiah foresaw for our future when men are not strong and ethical enough to take the lead.
Youths oppress my people, women rule over them. My people, your guides lead you astray; they turn you from the path. ~ Isaiah 3:12
That means fighting against the burning injustice that, if you’re born poor, you will die on average 9 years earlier than others. If you’re black, you’re treated more harshly by the criminal justice system than if you’re white. If you’re a white, working-class boy, you’re less likely than anybody else in Britain to go to university. If you’re at a state school, you’re less likely to reach the top professions than if you’re educated privately. If you’re a woman, you will earn less than a man. If you suffer from mental health problems, there’s not enough help to hand. If you’re young, you’ll find it harder than ever before to own your own home. ~ Theresa May’s First Statement as Prime Minister, July 13, 2016
Could it be only a theater between Johnson and Cameron? The mainstream media has depicted them as rivals, although is more probable both politicians were working together to achieve the same goal. It’s unarguably that both are insiders when it comes to the Jesuit World Order. David Cameron has even attended secret meetings of the Billdeberg Group, a secretive gathering of the most powerful men in the world founded by the Jesuit Józef Hieronim Retinger. Perhaps the Great Britain had to leave the EU in order for the City of London to separate from Europe and occupy its position alongside the Vatican and the Washington DC as a sovereign state subjected only to the Crown, which means subjected to the Pope. This would better fit the Scriptures with the Vatican as the beast in Revelation 17:12-13.
The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast. 13 They have one purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast. ~ Revelation 17:12-13
The European Union is just one more of the Vatican’s monstrous enterprises that mainly seeks to dominate and subjugate the European citizen back to Rome. The cunning Jesuit tactic of problem-reaction-solution has convinced many that in order to avoid conflict, it’s necessary to come together. What the common person does not realize is that these conflicts were all engineered at the first place. Ultimately, any gathering of states or institutions that do not have Christ in its core is at best, useless and at worst, dangerous. Once detected, it’s pernicious plans must be exposed and combated. The rulers of this world know their time is short as they are moving relentlessly to accomplish their goals. Advancements in science and technology combined with centuries of Jesuit indoctrination provide the today’s elite with an unprecedented power to enslave humanity. However, the Lord is sovereign and He’s allowing everything that is taking place. Let’s see how high they build their tower this time before it succumbs to ruins.
Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the earth rise up and the rulers band together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying, “Let us break their chains and throw off their shackles.” The One enthroned in heaven laughs; the Lord scoffs at them. He rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying, “I have installed my king on Zion, my holy mountain.” I will proclaim the Lord’s decree: He said to me, “You are my son; today I have become your father. Ask me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession. You will break them with a rod of iron; you will dash them to pieces like pottery.” Therefore, you kings, be wise; be warned, you rulers of the earth. Serve the Lord with fear and celebrate his rule with trembling. Kiss his son, or he will be angry and your way will lead to your destruction, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him. ~ Psalm 2
UPDATE: Friday, 7 October 2016; 3:50 PM, EST
Tony Blair: Rome’s Agent In London
Tony Blair, former Prime Minister of the UK from 1997 to 2007, was educated at St. John’s College, a Counter-Reformation Institution. Blair only converted to Catholicism in 2007, soon after leaving office, giving the impression he took the decision once out of the spotlight. His wife, practising Roman Catholic Cherie Blaire, had much to do with his choice. She is known for her feminist ideologies, even giving a lecture at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas in Rome entitledThe Church and Women’s Rights: time for a fresh perspective? In 2006, Blaire signed the EU’s new Constitutional Treaty in Rome under a massive statue of Pope Innocent X only to underscore once more who really is in control.
Summa Theologica, Question 66, Article 2
Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno (1931)
Address of Pope John Paul II to the former stagiaires of the Robert Schuman Foundation on November 7, 2013
Carlo Curti Gialdino, The Symbols of the European Union: origin of the design for the European flag.