God is real. Does this mean that science must stop?
The Tension Between Faith and Knowledge
The question of whether belief in
God negates the pursuit of science has echoed through centuries of debate. On
one side, skeptics argue that invoking God halts inquiry, replacing curiosity
with dogma. On the other, believers contend that science divorced from God
drifts into speculation and hubris. But perhaps this framing is flawed. If
science means true knowledge, then seeking God and studying the created
order are not enemies, but companions. True knowledge does not erase God—it
begins with Him.
The sun rises every morning and sets
every evening, not because of random chance, but because laws and principles
were set in motion by the Creator. Our desire to know why we exist and how
the world functions is not a rebellion against faith but an impulse placed
in us by God Himself. The real conflict arises only when people deny the
Creator and then attempt to build grand explanations without acknowledging the
Source.
True
Knowledge and the Creator
Science, at its best, is a pursuit
of truth. But truth cannot exist apart from the One who defines it. The
Scriptures affirm that God has placed eternity in the hearts of men
(Ecclesiastes 3:11), and with it a yearning to understand life’s purpose. When
we study the universe—whether the orbit of planets, the structure of DNA, or
the mechanics of photosynthesis—we are observing the handiwork of God.
To recognize that leaves grow on
trees, that seeds germinate with moisture, and that stars burn with nuclear
fusion is to describe how things function. Yet none of these
observations tell us why things exist in the first place. Why is there a
tree rather than nothing? Why does a seed carry within itself the mysterious
power of life? Why do laws of physics remain consistent across vast distances
and billions of years? These questions point beyond the microscope and
telescope toward the mind of the Creator.
The
Problem of Science Without God
When scientists assume from the
outset that no Creator exists, they inevitably craft theories built on
speculation rather than observable certainty. They may observe facts, but their
interpretations rest on philosophical assumptions rather than truth.
Take, for example, attempts to
explain the origin of the universe. Because no human being witnessed the first
moment of creation, every theory—from the Big Bang to multiverse
speculation—rests on inference, extrapolation, and mathematical imagination.
Such theories may appear sophisticated, but they cannot be proven in real
time. They are, in essence, educated guesses.
Once truth is rejected, thinking
drifts into fantasy. Many remain deceived because they live in a twilight
zone—close enough to truth’s light to glimpse reality, yet far enough into
shadow to mistake dim reflections for full illumination. Jesus warned of this
danger:
“Your eye is the lamp of your body;
when your eye is sound, your whole body is full of light; but when it is not
sound, your body is full of darkness. Therefore be careful lest the light in
you be darkness.” (Luke 11:34–35, WEB)
A person may believe they are
enlightened by science, yet if their foundation excludes God, what they call
light may in fact be darkness.
The
Limits of Scientific Inquiry
Science is powerful at explaining
processes, but limited in explaining purpose. For example:
- Observation:
A leaf grows on a tree.
- Analysis:
The leaf dies because chlorophyll breaks down and nutrients are withdrawn.
- Limitation:
Science cannot tell us why trees exist at all.
Similarly, we can describe how a
seed sprouts when moisture triggers enzymatic reactions. But which came first:
the seed or the tree? And why does either exist? Science cannot settle this
“chicken-or-egg” question without drifting into philosophical guesswork. Only
by acknowledging the Creator can we move from process to purpose.
When speculation replaces humility,
a contest begins between competing guesses. One expert claims the “most
fantastic” theory; another claims a “better” one. Neither can provide final
certainty. The debate becomes less about knowledge and more about authority.
Suppression
of Dissent: A Symptom of Darkness
History shows that when speculative
theories harden into dogma, those who disagree are silenced. Whether in
medieval scholasticism or modern secular academia, the temptation to muzzle
dissenters is strong. When challenges arise, the response is not always
dialogue but suppression. This is not progress—it is regression.
True science welcomes questions. It
thrives on testing, falsifying, and re-examining assumptions. But when science
becomes ideology, dissent becomes dangerous. Those who prefer darkness cannot
abide the intrusion of light, for light exposes the link between sin and death,
pride and futility.
The
Light Always Wins
The Bible affirms that God is
omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. His truth is not threatened by human
denial. Darkness may rage for a season, but light ultimately prevails. As John’s
Gospel declares:
“The light shines in the darkness,
and the darkness hasn’t overcome it.” (John 1:5, WEB)
In every generation, movements have
arisen to dismiss God—whether through rationalism, materialism, or atheism—but
the hunger for truth endures. Even many scientists, after years of research,
confess awe at the intricacy of creation. They may not always admit it openly,
but the fingerprints of God are unmistakable.
Faith
and Science as Partners
Faith and science need not be
adversaries. When aligned properly, science can be an act of worship—an
exploration of God’s creation that deepens our reverence for Him. Johannes
Kepler, a father of modern astronomy, described his work as “thinking God’s
thoughts after Him.” For him, the laws of planetary motion were not random
mechanics but evidence of divine order.
When science acknowledges its
limits, it thrives. It can investigate the how without pretending to
answer the why. And when faith acknowledges science, it sees in every
discovery a reason to marvel at the Creator’s wisdom.
The True Light of Knowledge
So, does belief in God mean that
science must stop? On the contrary. It means science can truly begin. Without
God, science risks wandering in endless circles of speculation, mistaking
shadows for reality. With God, science becomes a pursuit of true knowledge,
grounded in the recognition of the Creator’s design.
The danger is not science itself but
science severed from its Source. As Jesus warned, one must be careful lest the
light within turns out to be darkness. True enlightenment begins when we
acknowledge the One who said, “Let there be light.”
In the end, the light always wins.
Those who flee from it may cling to darkness, but the truth of God’s creation
shines unbroken. Science does not need to stop when we confess God is real—it
finally has a firm foundation upon which to stand.
No comments:
Post a Comment